As Sacramentans And Seattleites Fight To The Death Over The Kings, The NBA Counts Its Money

Three weeks from tomorrow, the NBA Board of Governors will vote on whether the Kings will be sold to Chris Hansen, who would move them to Seattle, or to a Sacramento group committed to keeping the team in town. They're bidding against each other, and no matter who wins, both cities will lose.

On the heels of a fourth major investor coming forward for the local bid, the Sacramento City Council voted late last night, 7-2, in favor of building a new arena. The deal is necessary to have in place when the ownership group makes it final pitch to the NBA on April 3, so it went through quickly, without much scrutiny or debate. Too bad, because it deserves to be examined: $258 million, nearly 58 percent of the total costs, will come from public money.

The debt would be borrowed against future parking revenues, a wishful scheme that's failed to meet projections in every city it's been tried. A watchdog group calls it "a horrible deal for taxpayers."

The city didn't have much choice. Keeping the Kings comes foremost in Sacramento, and to do that they must beat the proposed Seattle arena deal, where $200 million is set to come from public financing.

The situation is farcical, the NBA's plot downright sick. The citizens of Sacramento and Seattle, two basketball-mad cities that deserve better than this, have been forced to compete to see who will subsidize the mega-rich by gambling more of their cities' economic futures on high-risk investments.

Meanwhile, Sacramento ranks fourth-worst in the country in job creation. Washington faces a budget shortfall of $1.3 billion.

David Stern, in his last public comments on the matter, said the Sacramento bid was "not quite there," and urged them to up their offer. He hinted that the crucial vote could be pushed back, ostensibly to avoid rushing the issue, but actually to give the bidding war more time to rage. More counter-offers. More free money for the league.

The only way now for a city to land a franchise is to pledge more tax money. This is the endgame for the NBA—every hundred million an owner doesn't have to put into an arena is another hundred million added to the value of that franchise. By pitting Sacramento and Seattle against each other, there can be only one outcome. One city will overpay for its team. The other will have no team at all. And the league will get richer.