True fact, I have a friend who used to cut their cocaine with creatine because it was healthier and added muscles themoreyouknow.jpg
Are you missing the part where he set off the metal detector?
I can tell you are serious and smart because you keep putting random words in bold.
Also, if you honestly believe Rand Paul gives a shit about Muslims, I'd like to sell you a bridge.
So the answer to this question is yes, btw.
This is pretty much a ridiculous argument you are making. Are you pretending that lifestyle changes don't then improve diabetes, regardless of whether the base cause was genetics? The links that you put up actively argue against the argument that you are making and state repeatedly that environmental factors seem to take the lion's share of the blame for type II diabetes with a handful of exceptional cases. You're blowing the exceptions out to be the rule.
I often wonder if the people who are making comments like yours have ever even HEARD of Paula Deen before today because, as others have pointed out, comments like this are completely fucking irrelevant to the topic at hand. There's a world of difference between the ingredients in brie and the ingredients in Velveeta.
You can put whatever words you want to your Paleo diet, it doesn't stop the fact that Paleo dudes are almost always assholes about being Paleo dudes!
Really? There are hundreds of brands of ham out there, dude.
What are you even arguing?
You're not very good at sarcasm if you think what you wrote was sarcasm.
Because Ina Garten and Julia Child didn't make it their entire fucking selling point that they're using a shitton of butter and sugar in everything they cooked? You can't call class warfare and pop your monocle when the person being criticized fired the first shots. It's literally Paula Deen's entire persona, that she is making incredibly unhealthy food. Also, Hamilton literally says 4 different times, 4 different ways that it's stupid to actually blame her for obesity so seriously shut up?
Yes, those are life's only options!
"A more contrived Duffy" is A) impossible B) not something one would say to defend another human being?
I can't believe anyone paid you $5 to tweet "dan abrams" when you tweet that all the time on your own.
OK a thousand issues with this but here we go.
1) How is he an underdog? As someone else pointed out, he's a well-off white dude. If he was not a well-off white male Christian I really, really doubt he'd be the starting QB of the Denver Broncos actually! Remember how much shit Michael Vick got for being "unable to throw" (despite being leagues better than Tebow) his first couple seasons?
2) No one is "crucifying" Tim Tebow; if anything he has more fans than he would have for the fact that he is religious
3) Very few people think it is ok to be a huge fan of Ben Roethlisberger or Ray Lewis while simultaneously thinking you should hate Tebow? What the fuck are you even referring to with this?
4) I prefer the stupid ass posturing of "chauvinist" football players to the stupid ass posturing of a player who actively works with and has raised money for Focus on the Family, an organization that ACTIVELY is trying to remove the rights of women and gay people, which makes him kind of a bigger chauvinist than whatever wide receiver you're referring to with this weird code here.
1) How is he an underdog? As someone else pointed out, he's a well-off white dude. If he was not a well-off white male Christian I really, really doubt he'd be the starting QB of the Denver Broncos actually! Remember how much shit Michael Vick got for being "unable to throw" (despite being leagues better than Tebow) his first couple seasons?
2) No one is "crucifying" Tim Tebow; if anything he has more fans than he would have for the fact that he is religious
3) Very few people think it is ok to be a huge fan of Ben Roethlisberger or Ray Lewis while simultaneously thinking you should hate Tebow? What the fuck are you even referring to with this?
4) I prefer the stupid ass posturing of "chauvinist" football players to the stupid ass posturing of a player who actively works with and has raised money for Focus on the Family, an organization that ACTIVELY is trying to remove the rights of women and gay people, which makes him kind of a bigger chauvinist than whatever wide receiver you're referring to with this weird code here.
Non-sports fans are the ones who are propping him up so heavy, dude, in closing. People who are not fans of the Broncos or football are the ones I see in my twitter and Facebook feeds carrying on and on about him--and the funny thing is that what they all have in common is that they are all my old high school friends that became hyper-religious post school. I think the number of people who don't like football who are going out of their way to care about Tebow to neg him is a pretty radically small number.
He is not even kind of attractive, to me??
No, he probably isn't. Read the article maybe? He's experiencing the early stages of pitching a book to a publisher.
If you don't get it, then you are probably as clueless and stupid as this kid is? No offense!
Wow, shut the fuck up until you can learn how to read other people's posts? You're arguing against an insane point that no one made and obviously didn't read the article you're responding to, at all. You literally sound like an insane person right now. No one is mocking the homeless or implying that homeless people live an easy life; they are ridiculing this awful rich kid who pretended to be homeless while having insane amounts of access to rich people things and is now being a dick towards homeless people about how "easy" it is to be homeless. In closing, no, shut up again.
Your proposal isn't very bright or useful so why are we proposing it? Everyone is well aware of what the word homeless means! We can properly distinguish this kid's experience from the experiences of the actual homeless with another word: douchebaggery. Problem solved, put away your proposals, etc.
