gss th jks r nly K fr ppl wh d n cr ccdnts. Y jst lst lt f clcks. St's bcm cmmntry n SPN's tp strs nywys.
Why's t lwys gtt b th gd pr f tts?
This guy's name is Peter Schmuck.
@jamesjohnson01: Ok, I tend to side with the "less seriousness, more ha-ha" crowd, but I'm gonna bite here. For someone who seems to value "intelligence" so much, you should work on your writing. Close the thesaurus, learn some grammar, your shit doesn't make sense. All epiphanies are unforeseen. Saying redundantly meaningless is redundant.
On one-liners, blog comments are supposed to be concise, at least if you want people to read them. If you throw up a novella (like above) I'm probably going to skip your comment (unless I'm extremely bored, like this morning.) Hence the popular response "TL;DR."
If you've got so many real friends, go hang out with them instead of starting strange, redundant, meaningless, mundane, cliche, redundant, pedantic, pointless, redundant arguments.
Get Donavon McNabb in that lineup and then see what happens to your precious eyewitness identification.
Three seconds later, a giant bucket of chocolate syrup dropped on his head. Zack and Screech were spotted in the background snickering.
Time for resistance, this clan was totally teabagging me today because my clan wasn't online and they were just destroying everyone. So now I must teabag them. The laws of the video game universe.
/Will deny I ever typed that paragraph if it's ever brought up in conversation.
a demain duan.
@StrmKing: I definitely like it when the waitress brings me a frosty mug to put my beer in.
@ClintonPortishead: I thought the ribbing was intended for the females?
@NovakAintNoJokovic: Dude, don't think I haven't talked to her about this.
As for the serious side of this conversation, you're probably right, more people should result in more ideas. The other side of the argument (the side I tend to find myself on) founds itself in a more Freudian idea of the recurrence of limited significant or traumatic events dictating every word we say or action we make. I.e., every Hitchcock film is exactly the same because it attempts to convey the same exact message or feeling, the markers of Hitchcock's self-psychoanalysis.
I get the feeling this is why people call the field I chose to study "Bull Shit."
@StrmKing: If it's aroma you're after, then by all means, pour straight down the middle and allow a heady formation of foam to fill one quarter of the glass.
For me, I can't tolerate the eight seconds without alcohol touching my lips required by pouring.
@NovakAintNoJokovic: I gotcha, that was my best attempt at gracious acceptance of good-natured ribbing.
@NovakAintNoJokovic: See, some would argue that you are correct and that in drama we've just been recycling the canon of epics in some form for thousands of years. Others would argue that the assembly line process of Classic Hollywood enabled these stories to be altered and replicated at an increased rate, in essence accelerating the exploration of drama at a proportionately exponential rate.
My argument? "Touche, good sir."
@NovakAintNoJokovic: My bad, just finished my undergrad honors thesis on genre theory, it's like the citations type themselves.
@NovakAintNoJokovic: Every compelling story structure had been turned into a movie by 1960. I liken it to music and that one episode of Southpark: "Simpsons did it." It's all been done before, we are just attempting to rehash and improve at this point. (See: Bazin, Andre, "The Western: or the American Film Par Excellence.")
@StrmKing: Draught is always best. If you bought it in a bottle, keep it in the bottle. Brewers sometimes choose specific glass composition and color for a particular brew, and dumping it from one container to another isn't really going to effect it. A tap system, on the other hand, infuses carbonation during the pour and is always best.
In my completely ignorant opinion based on zero scientific fact.
@DMC-Man: perhaps YOU SUCK. How's that haps, brah?!
@NovakAintNoJokovic: If there is an intern girl's butt available, my thumb will always relinquish its judging rights.
@ClintonPortishead: I didn't have a good bad movie reference, other than Cat People which I assumed most people haven't seen.
But I watched Harold and Kumer Escape from Guantanamo Bay last night, and Neil Patrick Harris says, "What do you think the PH in NPH stands for? No, Poon-handler, but good guess." Hands down my favorite comedic movie moment in recent memory. But yeah, that was a stretch of the "PH" in your name. If I wasn't shmammmerrerd, I would have tried to make more sense.
@NovakAintNoJokovic: I love The Office., but you can't do a local news piece trying to talk up your new series by saying, "No one thought a series about a paper company could be funny. What about that?" (Actual response by cast member to FOX35 anchor asking the question: "What do you say to people who think a show about a parks and recreation department can't be funny?")
There was probably a better way to get that idea cross, because I think I have a good point about the inadequacy of shows depending entirely on format replication, but Newcastle has rendered me unable to speak effectively.
