<![CDATA[Deadspin: Comments]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/deadspin.com.png <![CDATA[Deadspin: Comments]]> http://deadspin.com/tag/comments http://deadspin.com/tag/comments <![CDATA[ Rejected Commenter Theater 4: Citizens on Patrol ]]> To keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane, co-editor of Walk Off Walk, to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

So here's this week's column, the next installment of Rejected Commenter Theater, after the jump. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

It's the fourth edition of Deadspin commenters' favorite feature, Rejected Commenter Theater! Deadspin readers need to try out to become full-fledged commenters, and I'm the one who approves and rejects them. I'll take the worst audition comments from the past few weeks and put them together in a short column so we can all point and laugh at how horrid some people's senses of humor are. They're not as funny as me! I find that amusing! Here we go:

Last month, Rick posted a YouTube video and wrote about how Charles Barkley was going to stop gambling. First of all, Charles Barkley is full of shit. Secondly, pending commenter BROWNBANDITO felt the urge to pipe in about Sir Charles:

WELL SAID, WHO YOU LIKE TONIGHT? DAM ERNIE NICE SET UP THATS WHAT HOMIES ARE FOR. ANYWAYZ C'MON CHARLES YOU KNOW WE DONT BELIEVE YOU.....YOUR STILL EATING THEM DOUBLE CHEESE BURGERS, TALKEN BOUT IM GONNA LOOSE WEIGHT.MAN JUST BE YOURSELF GAMBLE,PIGOUT,PUNCH PEOPLE IN THEIR FACES.THATS CHARLES THAT MADE YOU CHARLES........THATS THE CHARLES I LOVE. WE DONT NEED NO EXPLAINATION.JUST TAKE CARE OF YOURS AND YOUR FAM ..........AY YAH YAI MI GORDITO TIME FOR ANOTHER CHALUPA

Well damn, looks like BROWNBANDITO was quite the prognosticator. He totally called Charles Barkley out well before his latest indiscretion. I'm sorry I banned you so quickly, you crazy caps-lock-usin' sonofabitch. Let that be a lesson, future commenters. Don't use ALL CAPS when typing out a comment. It makes you sound crazy, like Jose Offerman-level crazy.

A couple weeks ago, contributor Pete Croatto gave us a a smart investigation into Prince Fielder's vegetarianism. Mr. Croatto presented the issues using well-researched facts and shared some interesting ideas on the benefits of vegetarianism. Which, of course, prompted the animal-loving PETA freaks to come out of the closet and attempt to post wacky comments. Commenter PhatP shares his/her ideas as such:

Vegetarians and vegans live much longer healthier lives than do meat eaters according to every major study done. You do not need to eat dead animals to be strong, healthy or happy. I've been vegan for almost 20 years and I can attest to not needing to eat animal flesh or drink animal milk.

Look it up...Meat consumption is the number one cause of global warming, polluter of the worlds water supply, the cause of the worlds grain shortage (and not bio fuels,look it up)
and the cause of over 40 billion land animals a year being slaughtered for trivial reasons.

That's actually one of the least wacky comments posted on the topic, but still, I am offended that PhatP thinks the full rack of sauce-slathered St. Louis ribs I consumed for dinner tonight came from a porker that was 'slaughtered for trivial reasons.' I hope PhatP was not offended that he/she was rejected for entirely consequential reasons.

Another unfortunate topic that brings out the crazies is the upcoming Presidential election. Deadspin columnist Big Daddy Drew contributed a thoughtful piece regarding Barack Obama, Tiger Woods, and the late Tim Russert. Yes, I was surprised that Big Daddy Balls wrote a thoughtful Balls Deep column. No, I was not surprised that the mere mention of 'Barack Obama' brought out some nutty folks. Here's LeonardBunting:

Your right, Obama does represent a historical moment of change..its called socialism. Matthew Noll Indianapolis, IN Matthew.Noll@gmail.com

Well, LeonardBunting Matthew Noll of Indianapolis, Indiana, if you're going to post a grammatically incorrect and wildly off-the-mark political comment, try not to sign it with your real name and email address. Folks, if you're going to contact Matthew, let's be on our best behaviors and use some discretion. Only serious emails, please. Commenter flygirlinmydreams takes the political message a little bit further and gets a little personal:

Will only younger voters accept a candidate's wife changing her image during the middle of a public campaign? We elders aren't that easy! She can look, act, speak as "darlingly" as possible, but I live by, "a leopard doesn't change her/his spots" because 99.99% of all times, it's been accurate. Convince me otherwise?

Fat chance we'll be able to convince you otherwise, flygirl. This is a humorous sports blog. We make dick jokes. Go back to TownHall.com.

Of course, not every rejected comment is of a political nature. Take WallaceCachifa's sole comment from last week:

Been reading Deadspin for about 4 months...what the hell does DUAN mean?

If you don't already know, you don't want to know. Forget it, Jake. It's ChinaDUAN.

These commenters, however, would never stick their noses somewhere they didn't belong because they earned Comments of the Fortnight:

Re: Bill Conlin's latest racially-insensitive comments
Arriaga_II: He was referring to Vineland's "World Famous Micks, Spicks & Zips Blueberry Harvest Festival" June 11-16.

Re: The Nets' wacky free gas promotion
UkraineNotWeak: Most people in Brooklyn get free gas via the siphon hose.

Re: The endorsements on Stefan Fatsis' new book
Will Leitch: Ha. Sorry. You might have heard, Buzz gets me flustered.

Thanks, Will, for the opportunity to write the combudsman columns and best wishes at New York magazine. I promise I won't ban you.

]]>
Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:00:17 EDT Will Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5018837&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How To Deal With A Turnover Without Getting Hot Cross Buns ]]> To keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane, co-editor of Walk Off Walk, to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

So here's this week's column, on some turnover that might be happening here in a few weeks, after the jump. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

As Deadspin has become more and more popular not just in the sports blogosphere but in the greater arena of pop culture, the website has attracted some great new talent to contribute smart and funny pieces. With the crowding of talented writers in the bullpen, some have been squeezed out and some have left for greener, safer pastures with ridiculously awful comments. We've also had more closers in the past few months than the 2008 Atlanta Braves. Heck, there have been more people writing about hockey alone on this website than the Ottawa Sun, Edmonton Sun, and Vancouver Sun combined.

But really, I've written about being funny in the comments of the closers' columns before. We're doing a good job with that! Yet we're about to face the biggest turnover in Deadspin history that has nothing to do with a Matt Leinart interception. Our devoted and steadfast editor Will is leaving his baby behind. I'm sure the commenters and readers of Deadspin shared my sentiment of panic: what the fuck is going to happen to Deadspin without its movie-quotin', Cardinal-lovin', aw-shucks-sayin' editor?

Short answer: I don't know. Long answer: I really don't know. Better answer: Let's not worry about it because we all know that the commenters' job is to make this place funnier. Herr Denton could bring on one of the Jezebel editrices to run this joint, and Deadspin would still be the best collection of sports hilarity on the Internet. One of the best qualities that Will brought to the table with his posts was the ability to make one great joke that set up the foundation to build a perfect comedy pyramid. We can still favor quality over quantity regardless of who is setting us up.

As your comment ombudsman, I implore the entire commenter community to continue to support Deadspin even after Will's time as editor is up. Who among us would deny him the chance to have a lasting legacy as the creator of the sports blog with the best commenters ever?

These commenters, however, only shone brightly for fourteen days and were merely just the Commenters of the Fortnight:

Re: Mariah Carey's ceremonial first pitch
MurrayHewitt: I believe the worst first pitch of all time was thrown by Steve Trachsel. The second pitch, though much better, was thrown 45 minutes later.

Re: The horrendous Mexican cycling accident photo
RachelRayIsTheDevil: Oh, for a moment I thought the picture was taken while Danica was adjusting her makeup on pit row.

Re: Will's big farewell announcement
Christmas Ape: You must have blown them away with your reviews of The Office episodes!

]]>
Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:00:51 EDT Will Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5014575&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Commentist Manifesto Is A Living Document ]]> To keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane, co-editor of Walk Off Walk, to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

So here's this week's column, on changes to the famed Commentist Manifesto, after the jump. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

In case you think I'm the only one who has ever penned critical columns about commenting on Deadspin, I'd ask you to take an trip back to September 2006. Yes, it's been nearly two years since the tyrannical threesome of Unsilent Majority, Big Daddy Drew and Captain Caveman cobbled together some wacky ideas and formulated the Commentist Manifesto. They gave us the single most important rule of Deadspin, "Be funny and do not not be funny," but did you know they also gave us ten other rules?

Sure, we sometimes ignore one or two of them on a regular basis. Shame! But really, the commenting culture at Deadspin has changed significantly over the past two years. We've had more commenters and comments get posted more quickly. Sheer volume is quite difficult to deal with. This is why I propose that we make the Commentist Manifesto a living and breathing document. I realize that many of you have been around long enough to have these rules shoved down your throat, but let's make them more palatable and add or subtract to the list.

For example, rule number six states:

"6. Thou shalt not comment a million times in one thread (again, unless thou art Unsilent)."

Well yes, this is still cromulent. However, comment numbers have exploded since 2006, so I don't see any problem with making multiple funny comments on a single post. If you've got it, flaunt it. If you don't, shut the hell up. I've urged you time and time again to not namedrop Nibbles or repeat jokes, so maybe we should alter this rule to say something like "Thou shalt make extra comments only if you are not repeating jokes or cursing out the goddamn server (that isn't really a stupid hamster) for not posting your comment immediately so why are you saying stupid stuff like that, Ghosts of the 7-Up Country?" Or do you think we should avoid run-on sentences in the Manifesto? I don't know, I'm just the combudsman and I'd like to know what you commenters (and non-commenters!) think.

So consider the Commentist Manifesto to be just like the United States Constitution, except with dick jokes and without granting inalienable rights. It's a living, breathing document, so let's say we add to it a bit. Footsteps Falco would have wanted it that way. What suggestions do you folks have?

These commenters might give you some ideas because they made the Comments of the Fortnight:

Re: Kevin Millar's Orioles Magic
OchentaYcinco: I thought Orioles Magic was when Peter Angelos made 85% of Camden Yards' crowds disappear.

Re: Some pretty Canadian lady
Andre Roussimoff: I'd deux deux deux her.

Re: Pat Sajak Bobblehead Giveaway Night
Gourmet Spud: It was supposed to be Ray Combs Night, but the bobbleheads got hung up in production.

]]>
Tue, 27 May 2008 16:00:53 EDT Will Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5011081&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Cruel To Be Kind ]]> cruel.jpgTo keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane, co-editor of Walk Off Walk, to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

So here's this week's column, on whether or not comments are "cruel," after the jump. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—--

Hey, remember when Will closed out all that Buzz Bissinger business? Yeah, me neither, so I have no shame keeping the lines of discussion wide open on Buzz and his rantings; I want to specifically discuss how what he said pertains to the comments we make here at Deadspin. After all, the comments are what enables the community of readers to give feedback to the editors and to make hilarious jokes about dead horses and sexually aggressive sportscasters. But do we have to be so goddamned cruel?

Bissinger lists three main criticisms of sports blogs: cruelty, dishonesty, and speed. I want to focus on the most important of those three, so let's ignore dishonesty and speed. When we comment, we are making jokes so there is no expectation of honesty. Also, speed has always been vital in comedy. Just ask Chris Farley's amphetamine-riddled corpse.

This leaves cruelty. What is it about anonymous commenting that allows someone to feel so safe about making brutal and horrifically vicious jokes about athletes they've never met? Oh yeah, it's the anonymity. Hundreds upon hundreds of us are hiding behind fake commenter names, thus protecting our precious reputations from the same slander we so freely sling at public figures like Bissinger, or Bob Costas. We don't hesitate to use curse words that would make our mothers blush, or to reference sexual acts that would make even Big Daddy Balls blush.

But isn't our right, as spelled out in the Deadspin commenting FAQ, to be anonymous? Sure, but that gives us no right to be cruel without being funny. Yes, we're just commenters, we're not reporters, we're not journalists, and, despite all the spinoff blogs, while we are in the Deadspin commenting box, we're not even bloggers. We're mostly here to be funny, and if Buzz Bissinger thinks that humor and cruelty are separate concepts, I'd like for him to name one polite (and funny) comedian in the history of the world.

Still, being cruel without being funny is wrong. Unfortunately, Bissinger had a ton of ammunition by just taking a cursory glance at the comments here. Sometimes, we post mean-spirited and quite unfunny garbage. That violates one of the ONLY two rules of Deadspin: do not not be funny. Every time I read through the pending comments of people who are auditioning to become commenters, I am very quick to deny people who are slinging insults without using humor. Why should the existing commenters be allowed to pull that crap? We shouldn't. No, we don't regularly execute commenters around here. But maybe we should stop giving people like Bob Costas the impression that we are cruel and unfunny assholes! I really LIKE Bob Costas! I don't want him to think I'm a dickhead!

Here are my two challenges to Deadspin commenters:

1. Don't be cruel without also being funny.
2. Try being funny without being cruel for just one day.

These commenters, however, don't need to work blue to be funny and thusly earned themselves Comments of the Fortnight:

Re: The Clemens-McCready affair
Jerkwheat: Koby Clemens is sneaking off with Abigail Breslin on the weekends

Re: Rick Ankiel's super-awesome center field throws
PenskeMaterial: There's a guy on my softball team who can fire a strike from the straightaway center field wall to the plate, every time. But like Ankiel, he does tons and tons of HGH.

Re: Lenny Dykstra's magazine missteps
Gourmet Spud: Athletes already have their own magazines. The weapons don't load themselves.

]]>
Mon, 12 May 2008 16:30:08 EDT Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=389484&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Ability To Embed Images In Comments Portends Apocalypse ]]> screamfoolscream5.jpgTo keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane, co-editor of Walk Off Walk, to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

So here's this week's column, on putting images in the comments, after the jump. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-

The super awesome Gawker tech folks have been giving us commenters a couple new toys to fool around with over the past few months. First, they gave us the power to embed YouTube clips in our comments. I'm happy to say that the Deadspin commentariat has not abused this privilege! Congratulations, everyone, for not posting anything disturbing or entirely off-topic in the comment section.

The Gawker tech folks then decided to grant us the ability to embed images in comments. What could possibly go wrong? One of our crudest commenters (who actually collected a Commenter of the Fortnight award last week ... what was I thinking?) posted a huge and very nasty image in a comment last week. Don't go looking for it because it's since been purged from the Internets. I'm not 100% sure what it was but it looked very similar to the inside of Katie Couric's colon. Gross. This commenter has since been banned from Deadspin but his contribution lives on, etched into our collective retinas.

Folks, if you are going to post an image in your comment, please make it either (a) relevant or (b) hilarious. Unlike embedded YouTube videos, images require a ton of policing for inappropriateness. YouTube videos are about 99% safe for work; they usually don't contain pornography, obscenity or the Mike Schmidt crying clip (seriously, can anyone find video of this? Email me.) Images, however, can exist on any network location so there is no other source we can rely on to censor clips. Instead, we have to police ourselves and narc out anyone who posts pictures of gaping. Be my little Stasi: if you see something, say something.

These commenters, however, don't need to lean on the crutch of images because they made the Comments of the Fortnight:

Re: Timberwolves' Clever New Ticket Price Policy
Gourmet Spud: Not to be outdone, the Nuggets have announced they will base next year's prices on a multiple of Carmelo Anthony's blood-alcohol level.

Re: The Pope's Visit to Nationals Park
Balls State Explorer: Another freakin' post about a former Cardinal.

Re: The Padres-Rockies marathon 22-inning game
RachelRayIsTheDevil: Gargantuan next day peanut dump

]]>
Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:00:42 EDT Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=384594&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Rejected Commenter Theater 3: The Rejeckoning ]]> rejectedcommentertheater.jpgTo keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane, co-editor of Walk Off Walk, to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

So here's this week's column, the quarterly performance of Rejected Commenter Theater, after the jump. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—--

Every week, tens upon tens of Deadspin readers try out to become full-fledged commenters. If you are lucky enough to become one of the approved, you earn the ability to think up and post hilarious puns about topics such as the hapless Washington Nationals (when will they finally get some hap!?). If you are unlucky enough to miss the cut, you may still win notoriety by getting your audition posted in Rejected Commenter Theater!

Perhaps you remember the last installment of Rejected Commenter Theater in which our regulars were introduced to the now infamous phrase "O AN HE SEXY." If not, let me explain the concept in three simple steps: (1) I read your comments (2) I pick out the worst ones (3) I publicly shame the person who made them. Let's get ready to shame humanity!

Perhaps you recall the Dana Jacobson fiasco from the Mike and Mike roast way back in January. She was suspended from the ESPNs after making those awful remarks about Jesus and Notre Dame and the fat man who coaches them. We received a ton of pending comments attacking Jacobson for making those sacrilegious 'jokes'. Here, one of the angry Jesus folks named SWEATWOMAN gives us the business:

OH I GET IT>>>YOU CAN"T MAKE NAPPY HAIR COMMENTS AGAINST ANOTHER RACE>>THAT ONE WILL GET YOU FIRED>>BUT>>YOU CAN MAKE HATE COMMENTS AGAINST THE CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE>>AND YOU WILL JUST GET A WEEKS WORTH OF VACATION>>>I GET IT NOW>>>

Obviously, SWEATWOMAN was dictating her comment to a Western Union man who was to send the message via telegram. Those must be 'stops' between her thoughts. We also received exactly one commenter who was defending Dana and her drunken vodka-fueled tirade. Here's Rhino196669:

Get off thr girl's back! Who among us, has never made a Fool of themself, after drinking an ocean of booze? "He who is without Sin, let him cast the first stone"! Cut the girl a break! I'm sure she feels bad enough. Don't kick someone when they're down because, SOMEDAY, YOU may be the one down!

Heck, I should have approved Rhino196669. He has drowned in an ocean of booze and made a fool of himself, so he's obviously one of us. Sorry, bro!

Deadspin celebrated a very special anniversary in January, as it was exactly one year after that awful horse named Barbaro was finally put down. The worldwide web of internetworked computerators have always been a breeding ground for horse-lovers and Barbaro nuts, and Deadspin has not been immune to these crazies. Here's what skw530 spewed for our entertainment:

Obviously, Deadspin users think they are funny. If you call a group of people who have raised almost a million dollars for Laminitis research and horse rescue scary, what do you think of yourselves. Now, go back to posting negativity or photoshopping pictures to make fun of people who accomplish more than you will ever do in your boring little lives.

User rlhaines follows:

you people make me sick , thought of glue? waste of meat? DISGUS TING> what do you people do all day ? think up ways to upset us true animal lovers.?yes barbaro is gone but he waas a horse. a creature of the earth just li9ke you and me. give me and barbaro a break. if you dont like hiom,KEEP YOUR OPINIIONS TO YOURSELF. thank yo

First of all, yes, we DO think we are funny and except for certain comedy pyramids that topple under the weight of extreme punniness, we ARE funny. Secondly, we make fun of dead people all the time (cough cough Bison Dele cough) so I think a silly dead horse is far less offensive. Now go away.

Finally, after the Giants defeated the Patriots in Super Bowl XL-whatever, we got an overflow of audition comments from Giants haters and Patriots haters alike. Most were of the standard, hack "my team is better than your team" variety. We don't like that kind of attitude here. Deadspin is the place where everyone's team is better than your team, especially when one roots for the Arizona Cardinals. I like to channel my inner Woody Allen and use the more self-deprecating humor; this is easy now that I am an Eagles fan. Anyway, back to the Giants-Pats Super Bowl; pending commenter Deadmanringstwice took a different route and ignored the Pats and Giants:

Hey, my name's Jon Benet Rams. I like Budweiser, the St. Louis Rams (duh!) and jokes about murdered 6 year old girls. I'm a class act.

Odd that I didn't approve this guy. I normally love JonBenet Ramsey jokes.

These commenters, however, are mature enough to avoid child-murder humor and instead made the Comments of the Fortnight:

Re: The Ernie Banks statue proofreading error
futuremrsrickankiel: In fairness, Will, if you were engraving the statue, you would have forgotten to close one of the tags at the end and the whole freaking statue would have been a hyperlink to Fire Joe Morgan.

Re: Andy Roddick's super hot girlfriend
Doyle McPoyle: And I've said it before, and I'll say it again: Brooklyn Decker sounds like one of those ridiculous sex moves, like the Cleveland Steamer, the Dutch Oven, the Boston Massacre, or the Kataroo Kangaroo.

Re: The Pat Summitt congratulatory post
Doug Llewelyn, Court Reporter: Last time I slept with her I got Aqua Net on my cock.

]]>
Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:30:10 EDT Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=379476&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ We Are (Mostly) Made of Stars ]]> stars.jpgTo keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane, co-editor of Walk Off Walk, to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

So here's this week's column, about this new "starring" system, after the jump. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-

When I took algebra in eighth grade, my teacher had a system in place that ignored the normal 'homework is due every day' system. Instead, he gave us a list of assignments at the beginning of each quarter and told us that we could finish them all at our own pace. Sounds great, right? The only catch was that we'd be graded based on how quickly we finished the assignments in relation to the average student in the class. The current location of the average would be marked on an ordered list of assignments with a star. Basically, we had to either keep up with 'the star' or stay ahead of the 'the star' if we wanted to get an A. This was bullshit. I was a math genius but could not be bothered with actually doing work; therefore, I was getting near-perfect test scores but not getting A's because I was consistently behind the star. I was a victim of a bourgeois grading system and now, instead of researching nuclear physics, I'm writing columns about commenting on an outside-the-mainstream sports website.

'The star' has since made its presence known on Deadspin, and if you've seen any comments by the great commenter TheStarterWife lately, then you have seen 'the star'. Where did this all come from? Well, I have no idea, but I'm sure the rest of the Gawker Media websites are using the stars with fervor. I believe TSW has earned her star from Defamer.com, and for some reason, she is allowed to bring her star with her when she talks about the Steelers on Deadspin or talks about her obsession with folk metal viking bands on Idolator. These other sites are singling out their best commenters, and I don't blame them. After all, these other non-Deadspin websites don't have such a large percentage of commenters who consistently bring the funny.

Here at Deadspin, we are all stars. I've resisted using my power to grant our best commenters with stars because (a) we already know who they are and (b) there are too many to count. I prefer to take an egalitarian approach which gives equal value to every person who is allowed to add something funny onto the blog items that Will posts. Instead of starring commenters, I would rather feature the best comments, which I do every two weeks. After all, even our best commenters sometimes struggle to say something humorous. Have you seen Big Daddy Drew's latest oeuvre? Stinkaroo!

Yes, I did name the top commenters of 2007 a few months ago, but that was only because I forgot to collect the best comments over the previous two weeks and I thought it would be a good gag at the time. Little did I know that it would lead to that Ballhype guy tabulating the +1's. In retrospect, that's a very fair way of determining the best of the best because we can all contribute.

So I leave the choice up to you, Deadspinners. Shall I begin starring whomever I perceive to be our best commenters, or should we continue to let the comments speak for themselves? Or option three: should I just give Supermike a star so we know which comments to ignore?

These comments, however, should not be ignored because they are the Comments of the Fortnight:

Re: Vin Scully Approval Rating
Big Daddy Drew: This rating brought to you by delicious Armour hot dogs!

Re: Brandon Marshall's McDonald's-related injury
Gourmet Spud: Ouch. That story made me Grimace.

Re: Brandon Marshall's McDonald's-related injury
Stev D: The hot side stay hot, the cool side stays cool and HOLY GOD MY ARM! DIAL 911!

]]>
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:30:44 EDT Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373999&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Bob Costas Ain't Lyin', Y'all Are Losers ]]> costaslosers.jpgTo keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane, co-editor of Walk Off Walk, to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

So here's this week's column, in which last week's comments by Bob Costas are discussed. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

—-—-—-—-—-—-—--

There's been much uproar and hullabaloo in the sportsblogosphere about Bob Costas' anti-blogger screed in the Miami Herald. Costas is the latest in a line of several old media types who have come out against modern communication technology. Who among us could forget Bill Conlin's pompous and bloviating words against Internet bloggers, er, I mean pamphleteers. Way to stay relevant, Bill. Or who doesn't remember the time Schrutebag instigated a DOS attack on The Big Lead? Sure, anyone who prefers Lost over The Sopranos is a boob but that doesn't mean you're allowed to shut his blog down, Colin. There are two differences here, though: (1) Conlin and Cowherd are attacking bloggers, but Costas is attacking the anonymous commenter and (2) Costas is nearly correct.

Anonymous commenting on newspaper websites is the new Wild West, but instead of six-shooters, the commenters are armed with stupidity. And unfortunately, stupidity is contagious. Unless a forum is moderated, this stupidity is allowed to seep through wires and routers and reach a much larger audience than Steve Johannes Gutenberg intended when he invented movable type. Stupidity plus impassioned fandom will always produce an awful comment. But does any of this matter? Let's take a look. Costas specifically mentions Dan Le Batard's column as a launching point for stupidity:

(Now) that pathetic get-a-life loser can piggyback onto someone who actually has some level of professional accountability and they can be comment No. 17 on Dan Le Batard's column. That, in most cases, grants a forum to somebody who has no particular insight or responsibility.

I've gone and pulled the seventeenth comment from each of Le Batard's last four columns on the Miami Herald website:

  • Re: Dwyane Wade - only nine comments
  • Re: Jason Taylor - "Hey Douglas...you don't have to look cross continent to see children to feel sorry for...there are plenty here in America who need love and support too!"
  • Re: Fredi Gonzalez - only nine comments
  • Re: Sean Taylor - "Please re read the article a few times and then comment...At no point does E tard say that Taylor was from the hood. He infers that Taylor had bad people around him at certain times of his life and that its not always easy to cut those people off. Even if it is the best thing to do. Dan isn't Shakespear (sic), so I shouldn't have to provide cliffnotes..."

    Huh? Costas is right: a forum has been granted to people with no insight or responsibility. But what Bob doesn't realize is that nobody is taking these comments seriously except the idiots who are commenting. Yes, I'm taking these out of context, but look, two of the columns couldn't even garner ten comments! Go ahead and click through to read all the comments on the columns; they won't make any sense in context either. This is not a forum upon which any reasonable person in the entire world is basing their opinions. Anonymous Internet commenting is not creating new personalities that people trust; responsible readers expect some sort of body of work before they will consider someone's opinion.

    The one thing that most traditional media companies don't understand is that comment sections need moderation. Deadspin is somewhat moderated; you need to audition to become a full-fledged commenter. If Gawker Media had opened the floodgates when they first put commenting on Deadspin and their other blogs, we would never have been able to create comedy pyramids without a whole lot of noise. Getting a commenter account isn't impossible, but not just anyone can stumble on an blogpost here and immediately 'piggyback' on Will's "level of professional accountability." The Miami Herald is slowly figuring this out. Maybe someday every online news outlet will have moderated comments; until then, I'm happy to stay at Deadspin where we commenters provide responsible insight to important topics every single day.

    These commenters, however, avoided Bob Costas' stink-eye with their Comments of the Fortnight:

    Re: Cape Cod League's copyright dispute with MLB
    Gourmet Spud: This reminds me of that famous case from the Negro Leagues, Major League Baseball v. Chicago Whites Suck Baseball Club.

    Re: Eliot Spitzer Night in Georgia
    Suss—: Also, for one night, the team will change its name to the Macon Babies.

    Re: The aforementioned Costas freakout
    Bob Loblaw: Why does mom's basement always get such a bad rap? Peter King writes his columns from the shitter.

    ]]> Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:30:50 EDT Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=368604&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[ The State of the Deadspin Commentariat Address ]]>

    To keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

    Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

    So here's this week's column, in which the Combudman in Chief addresses the Commenartiat and assures us that our threadly union is strong. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

    —-—-—-—-—-—-—-—--

    I come to you today to reassure you about the security of our commentariat. What happened last week was an unfortunate, but still isolated, incident. Rest assured that your thinly veiled biases and jokes about rape are still safe behind the ironclad protection of that clever little play on words you've created as your worktime alter ego. Chickens.

    What's that? You have no idea what I'm referring to? Good. Let me explain in the most ambiguous way possible to protect the identities of the innocent:

    Let's say that Writer A contributed a column to Deadspin and Commenter B left a comment on said column, to which Writer A took offense. So Writer A contacted the boss of Commenter B, whom we'll call Boss C and complained about Commenter B. So now Commenter B has retreated into the shadows because Boss C is monitoring his Internet usage. Commenter B was a longtime member of the Deadspin community and will be sorely missed. Deadspin Editor W got involved and kindly asked Writer A not to fuck around with his commenters anymore, and then politely asked Combudsman R to write a column about the whole incident, with this vital piece of information: Writer A already knew Commenter B's sekrit identity because they have a history of correspondence outside of Deadspin.

    Does that clear it up? No? My point is: nobody has access to your personal information. Neither Will nor Rick nor I can identify you, nor would we if we were privy to your personnel file. As as tipster or commenter, your secret identity is safe so long as you don't share your information with the Deadspin world. So feel free to keep sending anonymous tips to Will and Rick about wacky goings on at ESPN; feel free to keep making rude comments about ugly people. The Deadspin commenting box should be a safe place for those of us who make our full names known and those of us who wish to remain anonymous.

    These commenters, however, would shun their anonymity for a day to receive their Comments of the Fortnight trophies:

    Re: Barack Obama striking the Heisman pose
    blackheartededitor: Obama looked frantically around the room for a way to cover up his embarrassing boner...

    Re: Bryant McKinnie, escaping on a bus
    Doyle McPoyle: Unfortunately B-Mac's troubles were extended when he realized the vehicle he jumped into was actually the BangBus.

    Re: Bill Walton and Will Ferrell play HORSE
    Weed Against Speed: Huh. You would think since Walton was involved, they would have played a game of H-Y-P-E-R-B-O-L-E.

    ]]>
    Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:30:16 EST Christmas Ape http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=362829&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ You Got Your Video In My Comments; Peanut Butter In My Chocolate ]]> reesescups.jpgTo keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

    Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

    So here's this week's column, on the new YouTube-in-comments feature, is after the jump. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

    —-—-—-—-—-—-—-

    Gawker Media pater familias Nick Denton recently had the Gawker Tech folks enable a video-embedding feature in our comment section, and then he blogged about it. It seems as if you can simply copy and paste a YouTube link directly into the comment box and the video clip will show up when your comment is published. What a brilliant application of technology! Videos embedded in comments! This certainly will not lead to absolute anarchy and irritate the combudsman or those readers who share the combudsman's sense of aesthetics!

    Believe it or not, your faithful combuddy endorses this practice! There are many hilarious and/or poignant videos on the tubes that would be completely relevant to some of the posts on Deadspin. Sometimes, Will gives us a pertinent clip in the main section of his blogpost, but sometimes, it's up to us as the commenteriat to help him out with an appropriate (or occasionally inappropriate) video. Commenter CardinalRedOctober gives us a good example of proper usage in the Greg Gumbel Media Approval Ratings post, as he directs us to a clip of a sentimental Gumbel tearing up after the final NFC game broadcast by CBS. Gold star!

    Still, I urge other commenters to take pause before embedding a YouTube clip in a comment: does this relate at all to the topic? If not, is it at least the funniest video in Deadspin history? If the answer is still no, then please, just make a standard dick joke.

    I am glad, however, to let my column today serve as a sort of training ground and rehearsal space for both appropriate and inappropriate uses of this new commenting feature. Consider it a sacrifice. And for those of you who cannot see YouTube videos because of the filtering software at your place of business or education, I still don't care.

    I do care deeply, however, for those commenters who provided us with the Comments of the Fortnight:

    Re: The Pro Bowl fan with a bag of Jello shots
    ArkansasFred: Jello shot guy's colostomy bag full of mudslides is even more unsettling.

    Re: Spielberg Pulling Out of Olympic Ceremonies
    UkraineNotWeak: This is a rarity. A Jew turning down Chinese.

    Re: The Disturbing Image of the Thrashers' Mascot
    Camp Tiger Claw: This looks like that time I fucked Phyllis Diller.

    ]]>
    Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:40:09 EST Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=357628&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Dr. Strangeblog, Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying And Love The Closers ]]> strangelove.jpgTo keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

    Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

    So here's this week's column, about how to appropriately comment on Closers, is after the jump. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

    —-—-—-—-—-—-—-—

    I had an Abraham Simpson moment recently. I sat down and started writing a letter to Will:

    Dear Mr. Editor, There are too many closers nowadays. Please eliminate three. I am not a crackpot.

    Having three consecutive closers that early in the morning, I thought, led to a general malaise amongst commenters and didn't quite prepare us to be funny for the afternoon onslaught of crazy videos and wacky news stories. Yes, some of us like the NBA and some of us enjoy college basketball and the really insane among us want their own special place to comment about the NHL, but all too often, the discussions become rote "my team is better'n your team" arguments or ridiculous "no love for my favorite team" questions. Before I licked the envelope, however, I paused to think: What if all these closers actually provided us with a chance to be funny and we're just fucking it up?

    How can I scientifically check to see if the closers are being funny? I needed to count the jokes, so I sat down and analyzed all three of the major closers (Hirshey and his footie closer got a pass; I couldn't figure out what was a joke and what was a shameless book plug) and found that the joke-per-sentence ratio actually equaled the joke-per-sentence ratio in almost every other Deadspin post over the past three months. They're setting us up with a chance to be funny!

    Will only hires the best of the best bloggers to write the daily closers; we've seen a steady rotation of excellent writers telling us what happened last night in the NBA, NHL and college basketball. And soon, Associate Editor Rick will once again grace us with tiger attack references in his MLB closer.

    So let's follow their lead and build some comedy pyramids. If the College Basketball Closer makes a joke comparing Eddie Sutton to Count Chocula, then let's hear some jokes comparing Tubby Smith to Boo Berry. We don't need to hear that your favorite cereal is Cinnamon Toast Crunch. That's just a dry, humorless statement unless you add the comedy milk. If the NBA Closer doesn't mention the Memphis-Toronto game, don't tell us the score and express your joy about the Raptors' win. Make up a funny Chris Bosh abuses children joke or something. If the NHL Closer goes past 1500 words ... well ... you're on your own with that one.

    I tore up that letter to Will. Was it because I finally appreciated all the humor inside these closers? Maybe. Was it because I trust that our comments will be funny from here on out? Possibly. Was it because I ran out of stamps? Definitely. These folks, however, never run out of postage because their jokes got delivered as the Comments of the Fortnight:

    Re: Kool Aid sneakers
    Suss—: If you ever get in a fistfight with the Kool-Aid man, the best hiding place is to jump inside him.

    Re: Larry Johnson's expensive watch
    Sh!tshow: "What time is LJ?" "It's Trade Me to a Contender O'Clock."

    Re: Committing to the racist stereotype
    KarenUhOh: And I just spent twelve dollars learning to walk like an Egyptian.

    ]]>
    Mon, 04 Feb 2008 15:40:31 EST Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=352041&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Not Every Black Man In America Is Martin Lawrence ]]> martin.jpgTo keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

    Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

    So here's this week's column, on proper commenting relative to photos, is after the jump. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

    —-—-—-—-—-—-—-

    Sometimes, Will and Rick (and our many closers) deign to grace a blog post with a notably hilarious photo. I'm not talking about the times when the picture IS the blog post, but rather, the times when the photo is relevant to the accompanying story. Certain personalities make news rather frequently and their faces will show up in odd ways, paired with odd folks. We, as commenters, have no choice but to attack these photos with fervor. But please, this is Deadspin, and the number one rule is to be funny.

    Captioning a picture can be great. Hey, Gawker is even using the concept as a vehicle to harness the collective power of the commenter. For a recent example, let's look at a comment by perpetual r.o.y. about Amare Stoudamire's latest attempt at business casual attire. Oh, I get it. But there are other ways to make jokes using the photo, some good, some shitty. Lend me your ear and follow my rules:

    First and foremost, identifying lookalikes in the background of photos is hack. It's not even a joke! This may be hard for our Minnesotan commenters to hear, but not every black man in America is Martin Lawrence. Why isn't this practice funny? Think about it: do I come to your place of business and tell you that the co-worker in the next cubicle looks like Sandra Bullock or that your boss looks like a tall version of Jason Alexander? No, because nobody cares that I have the ability to match regular quotidian faces to those of celebrities. I also have no idea where you work.

    On the other hand, the "has really let one's self go" meme is a commenting crutch that even I use because it can still be amusing. You just have to pick your spots and choose the right celebrity. "But Rob, you just told me not to identify lookalikes!". True, but if you make us laugh, you can break any combudsman code you want. Remember, rule #1 of Deadspin is "be funny".

    Somebody told me last year that LOLcats would be so over by 2008. Well, somebody was wrong because we're almost a week into 2008 and the LOLcat meme keeps getting funnier. How can they be used on Deadspin? Well, just a couple weeks ago, commenter neckbeardedclam gave us this gem on a Woody Paige item. It's true, he's very hungry!

    These commenters, however, didn't leave me hungry because their Comments of the Fortnight filled me up with hilarity:

    Re: Chris Jessie grabs a loose fumble
    Dany Heatley Speedwagon: I thought Radio was black?

    Re: Zhang Bin's Wife and Her Wacky Accusations
    ProtectYourNeckBeard: Eating crow won't be too much of a hassle for her. I hear it's a delicacy.

    Re: Kansas' citrus-y victory
    Weed Against Speed: It that's what oranges looked like, we would all have scurvy.

    ]]>
    Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:05:17 EST Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=341542&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ That's It; We're Officially Out Of End Of Year Lists ]]> dorksdorks.jpgYou've always wondered — maybe — about those Deadspin comment "+1" points; has anyone ever compiled those things? Well, obviously not ... who has the time for that ... holy crap!

    Yep, Jason Gurney at Ballhype has actually put together the total list of "+1"s given amongst Deadspin commenters. We do not know why he did this, we do not understand it, but we salute him nevertheless. Here's how seriously he took this:

    I printed out each post from 2007, divided them up among 5 monkeys, and had them count up all of the +1's, +2's, +10's, and other variations that commenters have awarded each other—you know, in lieu of comment voting. (See footnote for a few caveats.) Before we get to the final tally, here are a few other nuggets we were able to extract:

    * Most points awarded in a single comment: a hundred quadrillion.
    * Fewest points awarded in a comment: 0.4 (S2N), 0.7 (Skeets)
    * Most plusses received from the combudsman: 3 each for Camp Tiger Claw and UkraineNotWeak
    * Most generous with the plusses: Signal to Noise (61), BigTenObsession (44), Gourmet Spud (42), MrRedDevil (40), Camp Tiger Claw (39)

    OK, ya'll just crazy now. Nutty world, kids.

    More Sports Blog Geekery: Top Deadspin Commenters 2007 [Ballhype]

    ]]>
    Fri, 28 Dec 2007 14:20:34 EST Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=338498&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Top Ten Commenting Memes of 2007 That Should Die In 2008 ]]> santasmokes.jpgTo keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

    Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

    So here's this week's column, on comment memes our combudsman would like to see go away, is after the jump. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

    —-—-—-—-—-—-—-—--

    I've been combudsmanning around these parts for nearly eight months and deadterning for just over a year. What have I learned?

    Commenters are simultaneously the funniest part and the most frustrating part of Deadspin. No worries: out of all the people who audition for comments, the unfunny ones can sometimes amuse me just as much as the funny ones. As for those of you who are already approved, I've been laying down rules and regulations all year long, so to fully get in the holiday spirit, here's more! I give you the top ten commenting memes of 2007 that I'd like to see dead in 2008.

    These items are irritating enough to stick in my craw but not really column-worthy on their own accord. That being said, I'm not putting an outright ban on these memes. Feel free to keep firing away your comments related to these topics as long as you understand how much it gives me the red ass. Here we go, in no particular order:

    1. Tim Hardaway Hates Gay People: We get it. A male is acting effeminately. Tim Hardaway hates gay people. Move on.

    2. Bill Simmons Has Gotten, Like, So Bad: You may not agree with everything he writes but telling everyone that he's a hack is just...hack.

    3. People Telling Us What To Listen To On Satellite Radio: I admit it, I do this too sometimes but XM's baseball coverage is by far superior to Sirius' football programming. (Also, Ron and Fez, noon to three)

    4. Duke-bashing: We as sports fans can hate whomever we want, but as Deadspin commenters, we are encouraged to be creative in our antagonism. Duke-bashing, like Boston-bashing, has become trite.

    5. Referring to Posts as 'Threads': This isn't some koffee klatch email between hausfraus about all the adorable things your children do. It's a blog post and we make funny comments. Well, most of us do.

    6. A-Rod/Jeter/Anyone is Gay: I blame the hilarious Dugout for this meme, but really, sports fans have been jeering their enemies for years by calling them 'fags' or 'queers'. Bad news, folks: Derek Jeter is straight (and dreamy!) Save your homophobic slings for the real gays, like John Amaechi or Brady Quinn.

    7. The Underpants Gnomes Bit: (1) Hack Comment (2) .... (3) Make Rob sad.

    8. Complaining About Being Fired After AJ Posts Salacious Pictures: Although I suppose this won't be a problem anymore now that Daulerio is about to retire the Oddsmaker column. Is that what happens when you run out of column ideas? Hm...

    9. Baiting Supermike: He's the commenter everyone loves to hate and secretly hates to love. He's smart, funny, and quick with the reply. But when poked with a stick, he becomes ornery and risks getting banned for the twelfth time. Please don't make me ban him again. I like having a foil.

    10. Kige Ramsey: 'Nuff said.

    This has been Rob Iracane for Deadspin sports. If you want me to have a happy new year, remember this list in 2008 and stay away from the crap.

    These commenters, however, never bring us crap because they are My Favorite Commenters of the Year:

    • Camp Tiger Claw: He had a streak of hilarity reminiscent of Christmas Ape in 2006.

    • ArkansasFred: He is filthy-mouthed and roots for Philly teams, and I don't think that's a coincidence.

    • Suss—: Yes, he's an employee of Gawker Media and a man of many blog-hats, but he remains one of the most consistent commenters since day one. Kudos!

      Folks, who are your favorite commenters?

    ]]>
    Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:05:18 EST Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=337208&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ This Joke Was Funnier Five Minutes Ago ]]> screamfoolscream8.jpgTo keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

    Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

    So here's this week's column, on repeating jokes, is after the jump. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

    I inherited two interesting traits from my ancestors, both of which I've been desperately trying to reverse over the past few years. The first trait is an urge to interrupt someone telling a story by telling my own story that somehow relates to the topic at hand. I am often so anxious to relate a hilarious anecdote that I stop listening to the person talking to me and wait for him to take a breath so I can start yapping. It's usually not a big problem, though, since most people just aren't very interesting anyway.

    The second trait is a unconscious disposition to tell my friends stories that I've already told them multiple times. After the third or fourth telling, my Gawker Stalker moment with Josie Bissett loses its luster. Yes, the oral tradition of my Italian forebears has passed down through the generations; the only difference between them and me is that I use 50% less hand gestures and speak 50 percent better broken English. Still, I have important things to say and I expect that you pay attention to me.

    What does this have to do with commenting on Deadspin? First off, we must stop making jokes that have already been made. I realize that we've been adding up to 100 comments on each post and I don't expect everyone to read every single one, unless you are going to jump into the conversation and add your own. Nothing gets my goat more than reading a hilarious joke at the beginning of the comments and then seeing the exact same joke two pages down and ten minutes later. Yuck! Excuse me for sounding like your tenth grade driving instructor, but commenting is a privilege and not a right, and that privilege can be taken away from you at any time, especially if you drink a gallon of margaritas and stay up until 4 a.m. talking to yourself in the Up All Night post (right, Skeets?). Read the comments. Savor them like a 15-year-old glass of scotch.

    Sometimes, however, you'll make a similar joke at the exact moment as someone else, and both comments will appear at the same time. How cute! You two are twinnies! Jinx! Someone owes someone else a beer! But you don't need to post another comment telling us how disappointed you are that you weren't first with that hilarious quip. You got beat fair and square and you lost your chance to win Commenter of the Fortnight, as opposed to the fine folks below:

    Re:Dog bites cornerback
    Tuffy: Once an Alabama police dog, always an Alabama police dog.

    Re:Devil Rays' new nautical stadium plans
    Doyle_McPoyle: Not to be outdone, the Mets new stadium will fully collapse every September.

    Re:Devil Rays' new nautical stadium plans
    Gourmet Spud: Not since Vanity Smurf have I seen a bluer flame.

    Also, every single pun that Suss made.

    ]]>
    Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:35:37 EST Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=331894&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Won't You Be My Friendster? ]]> screamfoolscream5.jpgTo keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

    Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

    So here's this week's column, which fully explains the whole "friend" commenting stuff our Gawker friends have brought us ... after the jump. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

    —-—-—-—-—-—-—-—--

    Will, Rick, and the weekend daddies may be the ones who sign their names to the posts around here, but we know who really brings the magic: Supermike. No, I'm kidding of course; it's every commenter except Supermike who make Deadspin run as smoothly as Brian Westbrook through the Redskins' secondary. But if you're like me and you want to follow Supermike's every move, you are in luck! Yes, it's finally true: you can now follow your favorite commenters and see their most hilarious retorts, even on the front page of Deadspin!

    Here's how: First, log in using your comment ID and password in the boxes at the top of the page. If you don't have an ID already, click the "new user" to sign up. Once you're logged in, click on your comment ID displayed at the top of the page where it says "welcome." This leads to your commenting home page, and along with updating your picture and screen name here, you can see all your comments, clipped posts and view your current friends and followers.

    How do you get friends? Well, it's just like real life. When you see a commenter you'd like to befriend, click the little plus icon next to their name. You've got a friend! And your new friend has a new follower: YOU! Like I said, it's just like real life. Next time I'm out at my local watering hole, I'm going to try pressing someone's "plus" icon if I'm feeling a bit lonely. Hopefully I won't get punched in the face.

    Now that you have friends and/or followers, how can you use this to your advantage? Well, you'll be able to read your friends' comments right on the front page of Deadspin, interspersed with Will's usual posts about Barbaro or YouTube videos with wacky pratfalls. You'll see your friends' comments from other Gawker Mediaís blogs, too, so you can follow all the wacky stuff Unsilent Majority says over at Fleshbot.

    The only thing more fun than adding a friend is breaking up with one. If you want to ditch someone because they've become about as boring as a Dolphins game, just click the "x" next to their commenter name. (Again, just like real life.) They'll disappear faster than the Lions' postseason plans. I'm putting as many professional football similes in this column as the Redskins blow late leads.

    Finally, if you want to totally take this social networking thing to the nth degree, click on someone's commenter name, check out their profile page, and leave them some hilarious feedback. Look, I just did it right this very minute! Ferreals! If you have any problems with this awesome new technology, send an email to commentguru AT Deadspin DOT com so I can compare your inadequacy to that of the Cincinnati Bengals.

    ]]>
    Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:35:25 EST Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=326325&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ That Whole Commenting Friends Thing You're Seeing ]]> screamfoolscream4.jpgSo Mr. Iracane will be doing a big huge FAQ on this come Monday, but we wanted to introduce to you some new commenting tricks our friends at Gawker have given us. In case you haven't noticed them already.

    The main thing is the "Friends" feature. If you think the anonymous human you keep laughing at (or, we suppose, with) is someone of the sort you'd like to track, just hit that little "+" sign, and you'll have a friend. If you click your own commenting name, you'll be able to see all your friends. After you have friended someone, links to their latest comments will begin appearing on the front page of the site mixed in between the regular posts.And everyone will be able to follow along and have a grand old time.

    So, you know, it's like Facebook, except with more jokes about penises. And if you're not a commenter, email Rob Iracane at commentguru@deadspin.com and state your case. And he'll explain it more on Monday. If we can help you get time away from your family this holiday week, we are pleased to oblige.

    ]]>
    Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:10:05 EST Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=325002&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ No, There Is No Love for Your Favorite Team ]]> screamfoolscream4.jpgTo keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

    Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

    So here's this week's column, about the prevalence of your favorite team in the morning closers ... after the jump. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

    —-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-

    With the triumphant return of Rick's NBA Closer and the unexpectedly stellar debut of the NHL Closer, we commenters are treated to a daily helping of selected game recaps from around the two major professional indoor sports. Say what you will about games played in arenas (and the less creative ones among you still can't stop saying "hoc-key?") but for people like me who don't watch "SportsCenter," these two Daily Closers keep me abreast of these non-football, non-baseball sports. Still, I check the Knicks score every morning because they are my favorite NBA team. If Rick doesn't write about them, it's no skin off my back. I probably wasted two hours the night before watching them lose. Why then would I compose a bitchy comment asking why there is no love for my favorite team?

    Yes, I'm talking about you, Mr. These-Five-Game-Recaps-Are-Not-Enough-For-Me. (potential commenter name alert!) I understand that you have devoted your life to following a particular group of gentlemen who all happen to wear the same outfit to work, and I salute you for purchasing a replica of said work garment. We all have our preferred franchises; that is what makes Deadspin a general sports blog and not a team-specific blog (even taking into account the extra Buzzsaw coverage). You may think comment readers want to know how fantastically well Player A performed for Team B, or how amazingly clutch Team C is now under Coach D, but really, you're not following the most important rule of Deadspin commenting: be funny, and do not not be funny. We get it. Your team is great. Move on.

    On a personal note, my skin literally crawls and I get a horrendous case of douche chills every time I see a comment that begins with the words "no love for?" In fact, I'm not sure which concept offends me more: complaining about a lack of coverage for one's team of choice, or the actual phrase "no love for." Cliches are difficult to get past when commenting; I've had to give 110%, bring my A-game and be more consistent just to avoid them. If we could get rid of this one, however, it's one step towards commenting perfection.

    These commenters take us three more steps further with their Comments of the Fortnight:


    Re: Eric Lindros' farewell
    strangeffect: according to wikipedia, the Flyers management essentially tried to kill him. Then again, wikipedia also says I'm a 9 foot tall pterodactyl.

    Re: Troy Williamson's lack of paycheck
    Big Daddy Drew: A funeral is about the only thing Williamson can catch these days.

    Re: Ricky Williams' yoga class
    Matt_T: Sure Ricky may know the downward facing dog, but Vick can teach him the electrocuting the shit out of a dog.

    ]]>
    Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:05:07 EST Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=321342&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Banned In The U.S.A. ]]> nononononosymbol.jpgTo keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

    Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

    So here's this week's column, on what it means to be "banned" ... after the jump. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

    —-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-

    As the official Deadspin commenting intern-slash-guru-slash-ombudsman, I get to read both unpublished comments and emails from the folks who are submitting them. Ideally, everyone would get a chance to make hilarious comments on our Web site; unfortunately, most of what I read in the unpublished queue is not quite on par with the witty repartee that our regular commenters contribute on a daily basis. That's quite a damning statement, too, because some of our regular commenters are not exactly Woody Allen circa 1965 in the humor department.

    Still, if you want to become a Deadspin commenter and you have no idea what you're doing, go read this FAQ and then come back and read some of these hints:

  • If you are trying to post comments and notice that your account has suddenly been "banned," that does not mean you have been naughty. It means you were not accepted as a commenter, and your comments have been deleted. Unfortunately, the very button I use to ban Supermike is also used to delete auditioning commenters. You'll get an awful red X over your avatar on your profile page, thus bringing great shame to your ancestors. Sucks, right? No worries: just create a new account and try again. Who is going to stop you? Not me.

  • If you email me and miraculously find yourself in my good graces, I will send you an official invite link. Use that link to create a brand new active commenting account; you can skip the auditioning process. If that invite link doesn't work, email me right away and I'll ignore you for 36 hours and then send you a new one. Easy peasy!

  • Still having technical difficulties? Can't upload an avatar? Don't email Will. The 'tips' email address exists for one reason and one reason alone: pictures of girls peeing in stadium bleachers. Remember this email address: commentguru@deadspin.com, for all your commenting-related inquiries.

    I've said the word 'comment' so much, the word has lost all meaning. These folks, however, mean the world to me because they made the Comments of the Fortnight:

  • Re: Eric Schnupp's "going problem"
    Sheepblog: How many Schnuppbucks will it take him to get out of jail?

  • Re: Larry King's asploded head
    Dread: Guess you guys aren't old enough to know what the aftermath of a prostate exam looks like.

  • Re: Colorado's World Series ticket sale fiasco
    Christmas Ape: The Rockies' team charter says to admit two of every animal.

  • Re: The worst video game athlete in history
  • Barry Lutz: I created a player named Adolf Hitler in NCAA Football '99. He was pretty bad. Terrific wide receiver, but very bad person.

    ]]> Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:40:52 EDT Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=316054&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[ Introducing Rejected Commenter Theater ]]> screamfoolscream4.jpgTo keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

    Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

    So here's this week's column, featuring Rejected Commenter Theater ... after the jump. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

    —-—-—-—-—-—-—-—

    In an effort to educate those of you who wish to become commenters, to entertain those of you who are already commenters and possibly to offend everyone in the process, I give you Rejected Commenter Theatre. Every day, tens upon tens of Deadspin readers audition to become commenters. My job as combudsman is to sift through these pending comments and separate the hilarious wheat from the tedious chaff. Today, I will present that chaff and attempt to reveal my reasons for rejecting it. Let's go!

    From Unsilent Majority's recap of the huge Stanford upset over USC, pending commenter BrokenPlayScramble gives us this gem:

    If losing at home when you're a 40 point favorite is cool, consider me senator Larry Craig.

    I don't get the joke; it reads like a mixed metaphor to me. Unless BrokenPlayScramble is actually United States Senator Larry Craig, in which case I feel bad for snubbing such an esteemed congresscritter.

    From the story of Jacksonville U's backup running back planting weed in the starting tailback's dorm room, pending commenter Anthony_C has this witty remark:

    This kid really took the low road on this one. I dont understand why he would plant the weed on his rival and then confess to doing it. Doesnt that defeat the purpose. Maybe he can be a starter on the prison team. If you havent checked out REDACTED WEB ADDRESS give it a try. I'm loving it!

    I'm still trying to figure out if Anthony_C is a real live human being or a spammy commenting robot that speaks in sentence fragments. Note: If you are a real human being and you want to suggest a website, make sure it's either relevant to the post or high quality free pornography.

    From Will's quick Illinois celebration leftover, pending commenter TideDruid deigns to grace us with this outburst:

    Aw heck, I can't resistÖ B-A-M-A, Bama all the way!

    Next time, resist that urge. Feel free to root for whoever you want, wear your heart on your sleeve, and don't let me stop you from supporting your team of choice, but if you want to comment at Deadspin, give us something funny. Also, I prefer Auburn.

    From the Chris Henry's stolen rental car post, pending commenter BengalsFan says:

    OKA, NOW AS MUCH AS DIS MITE HURT BUT YU GUYS ARE LAME YU HAVE NO LIFE LEAVE CHRIS HENRY!!!! LIVE YO LIFE HOP OFF OKA!!!!!!!!!LOZERS ^_^

    and then follows up with these words of wisdom:

    YU ARE LAME HE IZNT A THEIF I DON LIKE YOUR DUMB COMMENTS

    This happens from time to time. Weeks after a post appears on Deadspin, someone stumbles upon it and does their best impersonation of an AOL commenter. This was one of those moments. I have no advice for you, BengalsFan. I'm only posting your comment for laughs.

    Finally, I'd like to spotlight someone who I rejected based solely on his or her commenter name of choice, SuckItIcarane. I ain't got no quarrel with people who want to take a jab at me, but can you at least spell my goddamned name right?

    These folks not only know how to spell, they made the Comments of the Fortnight:


    Re: Rockies fans tinkling in the bleachers
    Decided Schematic Advantage: Piss Cam > Kiss Cam

    Re: Brad Miller's shiny new cornrows
    Camp Tiger Claw: It's the most efficient way to find the lice.

    Re: Indians Vs. Yankees Playoff Pants Party
    MitchKayak: In Cleveland, Joba would be considered a model.

    ]]>
    Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:05:48 EDT Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=310827&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Wah Wah This Column Is Too Long ]]> screamfoolscream4.jpgTo keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

    Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

    So here's this week's column, about "outsourcing" and post length ... after the jump. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

    The concept of a "blog" is almost 10 years old. The word "weblog" was coined by noted Joycean scholar and all-around kook Jorn Barger in December 1997, when he began to log the web as he surfed. His site, Robot Wisdom Weblog, appears to be nothing more than a list of extremely short descriptions of a wide variety of links, but that notion created by Barger indirectly birthed the entire blogosphere. Ten years later, blogs have blown up enough that people actually make full-time careers out of blogging, and sometimes, they even publish longer pieces written by other brilliant people.

    Our fearless editor Will Leitch is one of those full-time sports bloggers; he, along with associate editor Rick Chandler regale us with their hilarious takes on news stories, gossipy items and embedded viral videos five days a week, eight 10 hours a day. The least that we, as commenters, can do is to let these guys use their extensive "connections" in the media to bring in some fantastic writers, some on a regular basis, to entertain and educate us with extended, think-y features. Yes, sometimes these guest bloggers shit the bed in a historically painful way. Most of the time, however, we can truly be rewarded by reading the entire goddamned blog post before submitting a careless and unfunny "Wah, wah this is too long!" or "Wah, wah Will is outsourcing Deadspin!" comment.

    I can't force you to read every single word of these pieces nor would I stop anyone from critiquing them in the comment section. I can, however, implore you to either read the whole post before commenting or simply sit one out. Take a breather. Go get a Boku or a cookie and come back when Blogdome is posted.

    This whole idea really gets to the heart of commenting. If we don't have something positive to contribute, whether it's funny, thought-provoking, funny, titillating or funny, we shouldn't post anything. Whenever I email an invite to a new user, I tell them that we stress quality over quantity with comments at Deadspin. I'd still like to be able to type that with a straight face.

    My face was anything but straight when I LQTM'd at these Comments of the Fortnight:

    Re: The Sacrificial Burning of UM Hats
    Hit Bull Win Steak: It's funny how people in Michigan are always burning things they no longer like. That explains why Detroit looks like it does.

    Re: Tiger shitting in the woods
    Weed Against Speed: "Don't pinch it off just yet. Tiger may have just went number two but he is number one in the FedEx Cup standings."
    /Jim Nantz

    Re: Bill Wirtz kicks the bucket
    Shawon-O-Meter: This just in: Wirtz left the Blackhawks to Leona Helmsley's dog.

    Re: Cubs World Series tickets
    Suss—: Game 4's pitching matchup is Dewey vs. Truman.

    ]]>
    Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:35:54 EDT Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=305489&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Nibbles Is Still A Figment Of Your Imagination ]]> nibbleswee.jpgWe know we've been having some issues with commenting — and posts appearing, disappearing and reappearing at random, which should be fixed soon. For anyone who's confused, we asked Rob Iracane, the comment ombudsman, to explain matters.

    Are you a Deadspin commenter having trouble logging in and posting comments? Are you a wannabe commenter wondering why your comments aren't showing up? Are you some jerk who enjoys clicking on the new FLAG link? Then read ahead, this column is for you!

    The Gawker Media IT folks have once again upgraded the backend to our humble sports blog, and by "upgraded the backend," I mean, "messed with our collective psyches." If you're an active commenter having trouble posting comments, try to login on the gray box at the top of the page. You might still have to login every time you re-open your web browser, but that should be fixed soon.

    If you've been auditioning to become a commenter over the past few days, hold tight. Your comments are in the hopper, waiting to be either published or flushed down the terlet. The comment approval engine is just getting back on its non-existent feet so you should know very soon if you're funny enough to hang with Camp Tiger Claw, et al.

    Also, you may have noticed the new FLAG link that sits next to each comment. Anyone, both commenters and casual readers alike, can click on that link, which will automatically send an email to your friendly combudsman, alerting him to a questionable comment. If you are seriously offended by someone's comment, definitely flag it. But please be cautious when using this feature; if my inbox gets clogged with too many emails notifying me about Anchorman quotes or Nibbles references, I may miss out on Supermike's latest attempt to get banned.

    ]]>
    Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:35:30 EDT Leitch http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=300965&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ "I Hate College Football But I Respect Your Right To Enjoy It" ]]> screamfoolscream4.jpgTo keep the comments as fresh and outstanding as they've been up to this point, we've commissioned Commenting Guru Rob Iracane to write a bi-weekly Comment Ombudsman column. It runs every other week. This is that week.

    Mr. Iracane is the guy who approves and deletes comments around here, and the fellow to whom you should address any comment account requests, and he will explore issues involved in commenting, what makes a great comment thread, what's working, what isn't, answer your questions, so on. We want the place to continue to be as much fun as it is every day, and it's not an execution thread like our friends at Gawker do. We like to be inclusive here, because if we're not, we'd be forced to rely on our own wit and knowledge, and that's a scary thought indeed.

    So here's this week's column, about not liking certain sports ... after the jump. Of course, don't be afraid to let him have it in the comments.

    —-—-—-—-—-—-—-—

    I must admit, I am not much of a fan of college football. The sport is rooted in stale tradition, is tarnished with recruiting scandals and features a championship system that rewards teams based partly on the opinions of idiotic sportswriters. Worst of all, compared to the NFL, the quality of play is amateurish and downright boring. Also, I went to a college where the two most important aspects of Saturday games were wearing ties and date rape. I hate college football, but I still respect your right to enjoy it.

    As any of our weekend editors can tell you, college football is overwhelmingly popular on Deadspin, especially on Saturday game days. If I was a real dick, I could slink around the Hugh Johnson Project posts and type out angry comments decrying all that Darren McFadden bullshit or those Dan Shanoff missives about the Florida Gators. But I'm not a real dick, I just play one when I write these columns. Therefore, I will not post comments saying "College football sucks" or "I'm bored let's talk about Vanessa Hudgens." I defer to those of us who really enjoy the sport to make the funny and relevant comments.

    So let's do ourselves a favor and expand that level of respect to cover all sports. Don't bust into the "Daily Closer" and talk shit about baseball. Don't mess with Hirshey's column and insinuate that soccer players are effeminate. And for the love of God, if the NHL ever ends their bitter three-year labor dispute and if Will ever live-glogs a Stanley Cup final, let's not use that awful 'hoc-key?' cliche. It is tired and it is not funny.

    These commenters recognize the diversity of sports and also made the Comments of the Fortnight:

    Re: Stu Scott is the Moderator of Rap Wars
    AlumniGonzo: Stuart will be there because they need someone who can see both sides of the argument.

    Re: The Ascension of Lorenzen
    Jose Reyes The Roof: Byron Leftwich cut, Lorenzen starts... It's the circle of lipids.

    Re: Fatheads
    Unsilent Majority: I don't have a Fathead but I did get a Will Leitch Wallbanger. It's added a whole new element of brooding emotion to my apartment.

    ]]>