<![CDATA[Deadspin: fox sports]]> http://tags.deadspin.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/deadspin.com.png <![CDATA[Deadspin: fox sports]]> http://deadspin.com/tag/foxsports http://deadspin.com/tag/foxsports <![CDATA[FOX Sports Sends A Message: "We Are Shameless Corporate Whores"]]> Obviously, the FOX television network is not known for subtlety or restraint when it comes to shilling for its various synerg-tatsic properties, but their ridiculous Avatar promos on Sunday redefined crappy product placement (for crappy products.)

It was bad enough when they tried to weave the plot lines of Game 4 into a hackneyed story about blue rastafied cat aliens, but the most egregious example of fake enthusiasm for this sure-to-be-terrible movie was the actual fake enthusiasm by the fans watching it on the big screen at Cowboys Stadium. Look, if News Corp. wants to show their three-minute infomercial on the jumbotron that's fine. But don't make people pretend that it was it so exciting it brought them to their feet. I haven't seen acting that forced since the last episode of Joe Buck Live. Were they paid to do that or did those poor saps spend all their dignity just to earn tickets to a Cowboys game?

By the way, funny how the trailer listed James Cameron's previous sci-fi triumphs, but forgot to mention "The Abyss." What an odd oversight!

]]>
http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5395290&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Where'd Our Boobs Go, FOXSports?]]> It's Thursday, which means the latest edition of their "fleshy" "comedy" series. I'm sure you knew that. Doesn't look like any bare breasts made it on this week, but I'm not watching all 16 goddamn minutes to make sure. [FOXSports.com]

]]>
http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5367359&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Keep Your Boobs Out Of My Sports, FOXSports]]> So, what happened to FOXSports' attempt to one-up two-up other sports sites by featuring actual uncensored nudity? Taken down in a hot minute. Unfortunately, since this is the Internet, there is nowhere else to find pictures of breasts. [Sporting News]

]]>
http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5363550&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Chris Myers Compares Playing For Detroit To Dating Whoopi Goldberg]]> TMZ has the full quote from Myers, who tried to humorously correlate what it must be like for linebacker Larry Foote to go from the Super Bowl champion Steelers to the coldness of the D.

He said, "Going from two Super Bowls in Pittsburgh to the winless Detroit team — that's like going from dating Beyonce to Whoopi Goldberg."

I imagine either Fox Sports or Myers are cobbling together an insincere apology that will probably be shuffled around to the various media outlets offended by his comment, lest Myers wants to become a piƱata on The Viewfor the rest of the week.

I don't think it's a comment that will get him fired, but a statement containing the words "regret," "insensitive," and "poor taste" should be forthcoming before the day is over. I know they're the Detroit Lions, but they still have feelings.

NFL Announcer Rips Whoopi Goldberg [TMZ]

]]>
http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5358993&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Eh, Screw It: Jason Whitlock Is The Friendly, Outgoing Sort]]> Everyone's favorite columnist is just chilling as usual. This time he took some time out of his busy schedule to snap a photo with two women doing missionary work in Vegas this past summer.

These photos were sent to us by numerous people who are still under the impression that Deadspin is upset with AmeriKKKas' most cantankerous wordsmith, but that's simply not true. How can I judge a man for posing with questionably-attired women if I'm guilty of the same practice? It would just be hypocritical and wrong. So I won't.

This photo (and more!) can be seen at the LOTD public gallery.

*****

Thank you for your continued support of Deadspin. Don't get in the face with the swinging cookie SKEETS of life.

]]>
http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5141525&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Unfortunately, Tim McCarver Will Not Go To Prison Because Of This]]> Weird little story about a moonlighting Fox Sports "stat guy" who illegally used USMS transportation to shuttle around Buck, McCarver and Aikman. [Smoking Gun]

]]>
http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5129606&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Whitlock's Most Incisive Column Yet]]> Fox Sports has discovered a revolutionary new way to censor Jason Whitlock columns: Just leave out the words! (ESPN: Hey, you can do that??). Besides, you know Whitlock; you're familiar with the kind of thing he's going to say on any given issue. So are words even necessary? A headline should really be enough. Apparently this is the new trend at Fox Sports, and I know that Stephen A. is looking on with interest.

In case they've fixed this by the time you read it, or have taken down the page entirely, what we had here was the headline of a Whitlock column with no body type underneath. Online sports journalism for the busy reader on the go! Although the whole thing generated enough reader comments to make up for it.

Of course, it's possible that Whitlock couldn't back up his premise and simply gave up.

Other totally blank Fox Sports articles you may have missed:

&#8226; Clemens Wins America's Heart With Whimsical, Self-Deprecating Testimony

&#8226; Mangino Diet Enters Sixth Week

&#8226; Bob Knight Charms ESPN Viewers With Photos Of His Cat

&#8226; Berman's Solemn Vow: Lose The Combover, And Just Remember To Smile

Whitlock: Tom Brady May Soon Have A Huge Headache [Fox Sports]

]]>
http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=362905&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How will we be able to continue our sports...]]> How will we be able to continue our sports fan lives without "The Best Damn Sports Show?" [Awful Announcing]

]]>
http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=305625&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Let's Go To The Studio, Where It's Jimmy With Keggy And The Gang]]> eddiegeorgebcs.jpgConsidering that FOX has barely showed any college football this year and therefore has no established halftime "in the studio" team, we were curious how they would handle last night, which after all was the supposed biggest game of the year. We admire their conclusion: They just picked two retired players who were the biggest booster alumni of each of the teams and let them just scream. That's one way to do it!

Seriously, we never thought we would see the day when an "analyst" of a major sporting event was jumping up and down on the sidelines and yelling at a player to "run!" ... but that's exactly what you saw Eddie George — who has a freaking restaurant on campus — doing in the first quarter last night. Across from him was Emmitt Smith, who ... well, at least he didn't dance, we'll give him that.

Still, we think there's something to this idea; easing on down the slippery slope, it's honestly just a matter of time until they just go ahead and have the mascots doing halftime analysis. Now, if only Stanford could make it into a title game ...

Despite Rookie Status, Fox Hits The Ground Running [USA Today]

]]>
http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=227293&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[FoxTrax: Edifier, Clutterer Or Some Other Big Word?]]> The New York Times has a long story today about the "space-needy data" and "edifying nature" of FOX'S FoxTrax, that thing that Fox introduced for the World Series, which tracks the speed, curve and location of each pitch. The NYT is crazy about the device, and we agree that, done properly, it's a welcome addition.

But — and we don't mean to be cretins here — but we're not necessarily convinced this thing, you know, works. We know it's supposed to chart when the ball crosses the plate and not when it hits the catcher's glove, we get that. But, we dunno ... doesn't it look, like, way off to the rest of you? Like, balls obviously way off the plate show up as strikes — though they're not called as such — and vice versa? Is that just us? We had planned on bitching about this yesterday, but this is as much a news peg as we need.

If you don't like it, by the way, all you have to do is wait for Tim McCarver to say, "this FoxTrax is fantastic, it'll be around forever!" It won't make it to Game 4.

This Graphic Edifies Rather Than Clutters [NY Times]

]]>
http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=133030&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Que Es Mas Macho? ESPN or Yahoo?]]> Lots of chatter from pretty much everybody involved in our sports Web site traffic report from last week. To recap what we've gathered:

&#8226; ESPN people think Yahoo relies too much on fantasy numbers and isn't really as close as the numbers say.
&#8226; Yahoo people say they beat ESPN more often than people think and that it drives ESPN people crazy when that happens. And that they're charging fast.
&#8226; Everybody thinks FoxSports.com sucks and barely warrants mentioning.
&#8226; Maybe WWE shouldn't be included in sports Web site visit rankings.

We've been forwarded some numbers, but honestly, we need some Baseball Prospectus or Football Outsiders people to help us figure them out. Is there, like, an expert in this kind of stuff? Or (gulp) does it have to be us?

ESPN Still The Leader, But Barely [Deadspin]

]]>
http://deadspin.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=125824&view=rss&microfeed=true