Media Approval Ratings: Frank Deford
We still can't quite get over Daulerio's interview with Frank Deford. This is still our favorite part:
Women sports writers have very little sense of humor. And they look upon women in sports with out any kind of freedom. It’s like mathematics: you’re supposed to look at is a science and not as entertainment. And that would’ve been the case 20 years ago. They get very, very defensive if anybody writes anything that’s at all critical of women’s sports. Ironically, I’m someone who’s stood up for women’s sports through the years, been a total defender of Title 9 against all the men who screamed about it, but that didn’t cut me any slack. And here I was writing about “booties” as opposed to athleticism and that’s a sin. You can’t do that.
Totally! It's nice to still have Frank Deford around, isn't it? By the way, we absolutely loved The National and wish it would have hung around. Pre-Web, of course.
Anyway: Do you like the Frank Deford? Do you not like the Frank Deford?
Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.
Big Ten March Madness Contenders Ranked by Analytics
Three Eastern Conference Trade Deadline Winners to Watch
- NL Central 2026 Futures Picks: Brewers, Pirates and Cardinals Bets
- Thursday Feb. 26th NBA Best Bets: Top Basketball Betting Predictions Today
- Three Best College Basketball Bets For Feb. 25th's Slate
- Three Best NBA Bets for Tuesday Feb 24th's Slate
- NL East Future Betting Picks: Season Win Totals and Division Predictions
- Monday College Basketball Betting Picks for Houston-Kansas and Louisville-UNC
- Olympic Hockey Gold Medal Betting Picks: USA vs. Canada Predictions

