Sports News Without Fear, Favor or Compromise
Sports News Without Fear, Favor or Compromise

The NFL Draft Did Not Ruin Johnny Manziel

Illustration for article titled The NFL Draft Did Not Ruin Johnny Manziel

There is a weird-as-hell story on A1 of the New York Times today mashing up two of the two biggest stories of the NFL week—the indictment of Johnny Manziel for assault, and this Thursday’s NFL draft. It’s an amalgamation of two distinct ideas, both with merit but neither fully formed, fastened onto each other for the sake of newsworthiness and unable to hold together thanks to an implication of causation where there’s not even correlation.


The piece—an essay, really, by John Branch, a great reporter and fine writer—is hurt by an overreaching headline: “In Johnny Manziel, a Human Cost to the N.F.L. Draft Machine.” It’s a straight recapitulation of how Manziel went from hot college prospect to trainwreck, laced with accusations that the NFL draft is the purest distillation of a pernicious NFL culture that “[views] football players as interchangeable parts to be haggled or numbers to be calculated.”

It feints at the notion that the two are related, but never quite connects the dots (I suspect because it’s impossible). Here’s the closest thing to a thesis statement:

The N.F.L. draft — our coverage of it and our appetite for it — is a cultural phenomenon. But it also shows, as much as any sporting “event” in this country does, how fans and leagues — and even the players themselves in this age of social media — are willing to dehumanize the games they love, turning people into products and lives into entertainment.

Well, sure. The average NFL fan cares about a player only so much as that player can help his team win. Same goes for the team itself. The league cares about how much money that player can make it. None of this is unique to the NFL, or to this “age of social media,” and it sure as hell isn’t unique to Johnny Manziel.

It’s an irresponsible stretch to even suggest that Manziel’s precipitous draft-day fall had anything to do with his subsequent downward spiral. This is a person who had substance abuse problems before he left college, spent his entire life before entering the NFL with a shaky support system, and is and was, by all accounts, not a good person. The public eye post-draft wasn’t new to him—Manziel was one of the biggest college stars in decades, playing in Texas—and going to Cleveland might actually have lowered his local fame and reduced his circle of enablers.

Covering Manziel has been an exercise in increasing squeamishness. As of now, he’s not an NFL player and seems unlikely to ever be one again. He’s just a person with obvious physical, psychological, and criminal issues, and is a danger to himself and others. We’ve moved away from the day-to-day Manziel blotter, currently eagerly monitored by TMZ since he is in their bailiwick now instead of the sports world, because it’s downright uncomfortable. Things will probably end very poorly for him, and it doesn’t feel right to chronicle a collapse that no longer affects his very public job. He’s no longer a football player; he’s just another rich guy fucking up his life, and the lives of those around him. I won’t begrudge anyone who wants to track his downfall—rubbernecking a breakdown is the great American pastime—but it stopped being entertaining long ago.


This is maybe what Branch is getting at, the idea that the NFL so commoditizes athletes that it becomes difficult to feel sympathy for them as humans, and that social media’s disposability makes it easier to distance ourselves emotionally even as its immediacy facilitates the false sense that we can really know a player. Even it’s still a little too neat, this concept—that the way Manziel’s fall has been treated as a form of entertainment and the way the draft process treats young men as livestock are basically similar expressions of a public willingness to dehumanize others—has something to it.

Still, the failure here isn’t the NFL’s. The NFL is just one workplace that is, like nearly every other one in this country, ill-equipped to maturely or effectively address addiction among fungible employees. (The media is if anything even less equipped to properly handle substance abuse among its subjects.) This is an American problem, not a football one.


Sports entry drafts are bad things, and ought to be illegal, because they artificially depress workers’ salaries. But the draft circus did not create Johnny Manziel, and it did not fail him. And to conflate the two for the sake of making two separate, legitimate points manages only to weaken both arguments.

Deputy editor | Deadspin