From the Rangers’ side, of course, things aren’t so straightforward. Texas general manager Jon Daniels said that the club offered to move this week’s games to its ballpark in Arlington while treating the Astros as the home team and giving them the revenue from the series. But giving up the September home series would have created a 12-game, four-city road trip at the end of the season for a team hoping to compete for a wild card spot, and that was the sticking point for them:

Advertisement
Advertisement

In terms of both baseball and business, it’s a perfectly logical decision for the Rangers. But in terms of compassion, it’s pretty crummy. The quick takeaway here isn’t and won’t be that the front office made a measured decision about the welfare of their own team. It’s that they decided to shut out a club forced from its city by natural disaster, putting clear baseball needs over what might be seen as more abstract humanitarian ones. The Astros—with no major damage to their ballpark, their players physically safe, and the financial means as an organization to navigate whatever’s to come—are hardly an equal stand-in for thousands of suffering people in their region who have lost everything. But they still serve as a symbol of Houston, and so turning them away can only make the Rangers look insensitive and selfish.

At one point today, Daniels said he was “almost cringing” when he discussed the Rangers’ baseball-related needs in comparison to those of the Astros. That reaction is reasonable—which should have been enough to make him think that those listening might react the same way, too.