Every morning, the fine folks at Sports Radio Interviews sift through the a.m. drive-time chatter to bring you the best interviews with coaches, players, and personalities across the sports landscape. Today: NHL disciplinarian and former pro Brendan Shanahan talks league violence.
Brendan Shanahan joined The Fan 590 in Toronto to discuss his new role of handing out supplemental discipline, already handing out five supplemental discipline penalties in the preseason, how hard it is to analyze illegal hits after retiring, NHL players already disobeying the rules his committee just put out on instructional videos, and considering James Wisniewski a repeat offender before his suspension.
How much busier have you been handing out supplemental discipline than you thought you would be?
"I was told going into it [it] would be a big challenge, but sort of one thing people don't talk about is the challenge of preseason. Not every game is televised. We've gotta go out and seek out video as opposed to when the NHL regular season starts and we are going to be in our room and we've got the games in front of us and we're recording everything. It's a little more challenging in the preseason, but I think it's important, and it's certainly not fun. It's not fun to do these TV spots."
But did you think you would have five...supplemental discipline penalties [already]?
"I really didn't know what to expect. I just came ready to work... Like you said, I take this very seriously and I would say that the workload has been pretty intense because of the wishes of the league to put all of these videos on TV. I think the response that I am getting back from players is that they like it. This is the age of communication. Even when you are coaching these guys. I felt the same way at the end of my career with don't tell me show me. That's how a lot of players feel. That's what we are trying to respond to, because aside from delivering the message of what we are doing we really feel the videos are about clarity, transparency, and also education."
Is your job going to get tougher as we move along because everyone is scrutinizing every hearing? As a former player being out of the NHL a few months how hard is it to analyze? How difficult is that for you?
"I probably benefit to a certain degree that I've committed a lot of these crimes myself and I've been in this situation. Certainly it was [suggested] at one of our hearings—what would I have done in this situation? My honest answer is I would probably be sitting in the hearing chair as well, but I try to draw from my experience. I try to listen to the player. I try to listen to the manager. I go in with an open mind, but again I think I do my analysis… that's the other thing I do recall even on some of my own hearings. I never really laid down for the league and said ‘I am guilty. Go ahead and suspend me.' I always had a reason or an excuse. I try my best when I am on these hearings. It's hard because you do focus on the player. You start to feel for him. You feel for his family. It's a hard thing to do to take hockey away from a guy and to take money away from a guy, but then I also try to keep a focus on the other 700 players in the NHL, the game, and all the kids that also watch the NHL and use that as an example. I try to sort of keep a balanced perspective."
Have you had that moment yet where you are like, "wow I can't believe that player did that after we just sent out a video instructing against it?"
"I have, but at the same time, like I said, I do and I can't understand. I do understand the passion that's out there, having played after the lockout. I do know that things happen quickly. That's why we do have some wording. We added wording in the rule that sort of implies a player sort of turning just prior or simultaneous[ly] with the check—because things do happen quickly. I guess it is that judgement where we feel a player did have enough time to minimize or make a safer choice. You do sometimes say, 'did he really just do what I saw?' But again, I think for the most part, these are all guys that are passionate. They are trying to make a team. I get it. I get. It doesn't mean that it's okay, but I understand some of the behavior to a certain degree."
This post, written by Steven Cuce, appears courtesy of Sports Radio Interviews. For the complete highlights of the interview, as well as audio, click here.
More from Sports Radio Interviews
• Bud Selig sits at home many a night.
• Brian Urlacher does not think about his hits.
• Fred Couples still believes in Tiger Woods.