Pete Carroll Is The Only Playoff Coach With A Quarterback Controversy
Every morning, the fine folks at Sports Radio Interviews sift through the a.m. drive-time chatter to bring you the best interviews with coaches, players, and personalities across the sports landscape. Today: Whitehurst or Hasselback? As if it matters.
Pete Carroll joined XX Sports Radio in San Diego with Scott and BR to discuss clinching the playoff home game, doing so with Charlie Whitehurst at quarterback, if he thought about playing veteran Matt Hasselbeck, if he'll consider Hasselbeck going forward and what it's going to be like to host the defending Super Bowl champs.
On getting the victory to make the playoffs: "We had a great time with it. We hadn't been playing real good lately, so to be able to pull it together like that when we needed it most was really rewarding and a great accomplishment for our young team."
On getting it done with backup quarterback Charlie Whitehurst: "I'm telling you, he had so much fun. … He was so thrilled just to be part of that thing … and also to pull it off. He did a really nice job, took care of the football. He avoided getting hit by those guys. That's only the second time this year they didn't get a sack."
On whether he considered going with Matt Hasselbeck: "Some of the guys on the staff were bringing it up, but I was pretty committed. I really felt like Matt was going to be vulnerable. … It was just going to be a hard night for him. If we had to go with him and we weren't getting anything done then we would've given him a chance."
On whether he'll use everyone bashing the 7-9 season as motivation: "No (sarcastically). We won't do that. We don't want to use that underdog stuff. … We won't use that at all."
On getting a chance to host the Super Bowl champs, who beat them earlier in the season: "It is pretty cool. I wonder if they're going to come walking out of the trees like they do [in the commercial]. … We played those guys and Drew [Brees] played particularly well against us. He ripped us up when we played them down there. The familiarity with that game and also that we've seen them play all our opponents from our division and stuff this year helps us have a feel for them."
On whether he's made up his mind to play Whitehurst against the Saints: "No I didn't say that at all. You're reading between the lines. We'll figure that out. … If you look back, Matt played great against these guys … and he's been in these situations. It'll be an interesting decision."
On surrounding himself with younger coaches: "That's really by design. There's a couple reason. One of them, I like guys who are on the way up … and will do anything that you put in front of them. … I think the youthful part of that really shows up because these guys have to work really hard. … You need a lot of juice and to not have been there 1,000 times before. … I didn't start out that way, but when I went to USC I really started to go the other way."
This post, written by Eric Schmoldt, appears courtesy of Sports Radio Interviews. For the complete highlights of the interview, as well as audio, click here.
More from Sports Radio Interviews • Gary Patterson sounds pretty OK with the BCS, now that he's moving to a BCS Conference. • Think Nick Collins is salivating at the prospect of a "75 percent" Michael Vick? • Gary Kubiak still has a job.
Related
Venezuela’s WBC Win Exposed What Team USA Must Fix
UFC London Betting Picks: Best Plays for Fight Night
Duke Survives Upset Scare, Now Set to Roll Past TCU
Akron vs Texas Tech, Clemson vs Iowa: Best Bets for Friday
- NCAA Tournament Thursday Picks: Why Georgia and Saint Mary’s Offer Value
- NBA Picks Today: Best Bets for Warriors vs Celtics, Lakers vs Rockets
- Miami (OH) vs SMU Prediction: Best Bet for NCAA Play-In Game
- MLB Home Run Leader Future Picks: Best Bets for 2026 Season
- Top NBA Picks for Today: Thunder vs Magic, Cavs vs Bucks, Nuggets vs 76ers
- Best Future Bets for MLB Strikeout Leader: Crochet, Gilbert, and Cease
- Top NBA Picks Today: Betting Predictions for Monday’s NBA Slate

