What ESPN Mobile SHOULD Have Been
![This image was lost some time after publication, but you can still view it [object Object] .](https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-1200,fo-auto/Image_Not_Found_1x_qjofp8.png)
This image was lost some time after publication, but you can still view it [object Object] . In response to our post yesterday about ESPN taking a $25 million loss on ESPN Mobile, reader Jim from Boston writes in to tell us where, precisely, the network's pricing plan might have gone wrong.
A little bit of market research would have solved this for them. Q: What market segment needs the absolute, most up to date sports scores, info, etc? A: Bookies. Q: What phone does your average bookie have? A: The cheapest-ass no-contract pre-paid he can find since he'll only have it for a couple weeks before he gets another. Add in some voice encryption, host the billing records in a third world country, and you might have a real product. Not that I know anyone who would need that specific set of features. Ahem.
So depressingly, obviously true.
What's $25 Million Between Friends? [Deadspin]
Related
Michael Page’s UFC Exit Proves Winning Isn’t Always Enough
Mets vs. Yankees Subway Series Friday Betting Picks
MLB Best Bets: Three Picks for Thursday’s Five-Game Slate
- Rams vs. 49ers Bet Prediction: Why Los Angeles Is the Pick in Australia
- MLB Wednesday Betting Picks: Cubs vs. Brewers, Aaron Judge and More
- Seahawks vs. Patriots Betting Pick for Super Bowl LX Rematch
- FIBA Women’s World Cup Picks: Back Team USA and Germany in Tuesday’s Action
- Dana White's Contender Series Week 5 Predictions and Picks
- Reds vs. Dodgers Prediction: Why the Dodgers Run Line Is Tuesday’s Best Bet
- 3 NFL Futures Bets to Make Before the 2026 Season Begins
