What ESPN Mobile SHOULD Have Been
This image was lost some time after publication, but you can still view it [object Object] . In response to our post yesterday about ESPN taking a $25 million loss on ESPN Mobile, reader Jim from Boston writes in to tell us where, precisely, the network's pricing plan might have gone wrong.
A little bit of market research would have solved this for them. Q: What market segment needs the absolute, most up to date sports scores, info, etc? A: Bookies. Q: What phone does your average bookie have? A: The cheapest-ass no-contract pre-paid he can find since he'll only have it for a couple weeks before he gets another. Add in some voice encryption, host the billing records in a third world country, and you might have a real product. Not that I know anyone who would need that specific set of features. Ahem.
So depressingly, obviously true.
What's $25 Million Between Friends? [Deadspin]
Related
Dallas Cowboys Struggle Again, Playoff Picture Looks Bleak
How the WNBA Could Learn from an Outrageously Simple NBA Fix
- Early 2026 World Series Betting Odds: Can Anyone Stop the Dodgers?
- Cardinals vs. Cowboys Week 9 Monday Night Football Top Betting Picks, Predictions
- NBA Best Bets Today: Bulls, Spurs, and Thunder Picks for Sunday Slate
- Seahawks vs. Commanders Week 9 Sunday Night Football Top Betting Picks, Predictions
- Top 10 NFL Player Props for Week 9: Best Bets and Predictions
- College Football Week 10 Picks: Tennessee, Miami, and More Best Bets
- NBA Halloween Betting Picks: Celtics, Bulls, and Grizzlies Highlight Tonight’s Best Bets

