What ESPN Mobile SHOULD Have Been
This image was lost some time after publication, but you can still view it [object Object] . In response to our post yesterday about ESPN taking a $25 million loss on ESPN Mobile, reader Jim from Boston writes in to tell us where, precisely, the network's pricing plan might have gone wrong.
A little bit of market research would have solved this for them. Q: What market segment needs the absolute, most up to date sports scores, info, etc? A: Bookies. Q: What phone does your average bookie have? A: The cheapest-ass no-contract pre-paid he can find since he'll only have it for a couple weeks before he gets another. Add in some voice encryption, host the billing records in a third world country, and you might have a real product. Not that I know anyone who would need that specific set of features. Ahem.
So depressingly, obviously true.
What's $25 Million Between Friends? [Deadspin]
Related
SEC Tournament Breakdown: Florida, Arkansas Lead the Chase
UFC 326 Needed To Be Great…but It Wasn’t
- College Basketball Best Bets: Florida, Duke and Alabama Highlight Saturday Picks
- UFC 326 Betting Picks: Max Holloway vs. Charles Oliveira Headlines Stacked Card
- 2026 MLB Rookie of the Year Odds: Best AL and NL Futures Bets
- Best College Basketball Bets Today: Miami Ohio Headlines Friday's Slate
- NBA Picks for March 5: Best Betting Picks on Thursday
- Arnold Palmer Invitational Betting Picks: Fleetwood, McIlroy and Lowry Bets
- Best Team USA Player Future Betting Picks for the World Baseball Classic

