What Happens When Teammates Rape A Teammate?

Illustration for article titled What Happens When Teammates Rape A Teammate?

This piece originally ran at The Sport Spectacle.

In January 2013, two athletes sexually assaulted a co-worker and teammate.

The three members of the Lloyd Irvin martial arts academy ran into each other at a New Year's Eve party at a nightclub. One teammate had too much to drink and didn't want to drive home. The others offered her a ride, but instead of bringing their teammate back home, they attacked her in a parking garage. The assault is described in detail in the criminal complaint filed against Matthew Maldonado and Nicholas Schultz. The police could produce a gruesomely detailed narrative because security cameras in the parking lot recorded the whole thing. One of the least horrible passages, via Zach Arnold of Fight Opinion:

The Complainant then pushed Defendant Schultz off her as her body slumped to the ground with her head still against the wall. Defendant Schultz then advanced toward the Complainant and began to lie on top of her. Defendant Schultz again pulled the Complainant towards him, holding on to her until her body collapsed again, this time her head striking the ground.


As they assaulted their teammate, she fell over, asked that they stop, and hit her head on the ground and against the wall. When they finished, the two men left their Brazilian jiu jitsu (BJJ) teammate unconscious on the parking lot pavement. It was 38 degrees. There she lay until someone walking by heard her cry for help. Schultz and Maldonado had offered her a ride home; instead of looking after a person they saw just about daily at their gym, they attacked her and left her for dead. As one member of the BJJ community put it, they left her there like she was a piece of trash—which is, of course, exactly how other people in that community have talked about her.

When this story broke, it quickly came to light that in 1989 the man running their gym, Lloyd Irvin, had been charged with rape. He'd participated in a gang rape—most of the men involved went to jail. Because he didn't have intercourse with the victim, this man did not.

This past winter, there was an exodus of fighters from this man's gym; athletes left as they learned of yet more harassment of teammates within the gym. This wasn't a club they wanted any part of, and they went public with their outrage. (See Brent Brookhouse's reporting at SBNation's Bloody Elbow, and listen to Mike Fowler talk about these issues in an interview for Open Mat. The relevant section starts at 1:14.)

This past week, in spite of video evidence of the assault, a jury acquitted the two men of kidnapping and first and second degree sexual assault. A mistrial was declared regarding a misdemeanor charge against Schultz.

Over the past year, the leader of this gym, the man who'd escaped the rape charge in 1989, has scrambled to try to paper over the scandal of his conduct—much of this story has been acted out through social media, and much of his behavior has only served to confirm him as an abusive coach. People in the Brazilian jiu jitsu and martial arts community have been doing serious soul searching: a public conversation about rape, violence, aggression, and power began almost as soon as the story broke.

For example, from the start, Georgette Oden, a BJJ practitioner and an assistant attorney general in Texas, has been breaking things down for the BJJ community on her blog Georgette's Jiu Jitsu World. Her posts are very helpful to readers who need to understand what sexual assault is, and, more recently, how a jury might acquit defendants and why an acquittal doesn't mean that the victim wasn't raped.


Aaron France, a D.C. police detective who is also a BJJ coach, addressed the case in a Facebook post that has since been shared widely on Reddit and on blogs. He attended as much of the trial as he could, and saw the video evidence. When Maldonado was acquitted, some people were eager to celebrate this as a declaration of his innocence. France writes:

Ask yourself; if this happened to your wife, your daughter, your girlfriend, your sister, or even a close female friend, would you advocate Maldonado's innocence? Most of you would be calling for blood. Some of you would even take it yourselves. So if we were to look at Maldonado's behavior, put criminal implications aside and give him the benefit of the doubt, here's the best thing we can say about him… He had sex with a woman who was intoxicated to the point where she could not walk, and afterwards he treated her like a piece of trash, by leaving her half naked on the cement floor of a parking garage, in the middle of the night, when it was barely above freezing.

And that woman? She was his "teammate." Not many people outside of the Brazilian jiu jitsu Community can comprehend the bond that develops between training partners, due to the level of trust that training partners are required to develop in each other.

…Yet there are a few people who believe that we should let him back into the Brazilian jiu jitsu community. These people believe that he should be allowed to continue to sharpen his skills, learning to choke people and cause their joints to stop functioning. They apparently believe that he should be allowed to do this in the presence of women and children. How can you possibly ever trust this man not to just hang onto a choke, or not hold an armbar after you tap? He's already demonstrated a propensity to do what he wants with another persons body, why should we believe it ends with sex?


That statement is preceded by a sobering account of the steps required to bring a rape case to trial. That it reached that stage at all, he explains, has to be valued as a certain small measure of justice. Juries—here he cites the Rodney King verdict—don't always get things right.

He reminds his readers that people who commit sexual assault pose a danger to everyone around them. It is wrong, he points out, to assume that the violence of their behavior towards a woman is somehow unique to their relationships with women. It is evidence of how they treat people. Martial arts students are physically vulnerable to each other; an irresponsible training partner will hurt the people in his world.


Two Gracie brothers—members of the first family of Brazilian jiu jitsu—posted a sincere and thoughtful discussion of the crisis to their popular Youtube channel in January. In that discussion, they emphasize the challenge of martial arts training: it can either produce a balanced, peaceful athlete, or an aggressive and antagonistic one. They also stress the vulnerability of training partners—not women, mind you, but all of the people with whom you study a martial art.

The story of the abusive environment cultivated by Lloyd Irvin has scarcely left the MMA bubble, however. If it were not for the work done at Bloody Elbow, I'm not sure this story would have any presence at all in sports media more broadly. It surely deserves much more attention than it's gotten.


It deserves attention in part because the victims, the abusers, the bystanders and the defenders were all teammates and training partners. There are few sports communities in which such a thing is possible. And to outsiders, such a thing is truly remarkable, given the nature of the sport we are talking about. In the U.S., young women grapple against young men in high school competition, and those women expand their training into BJJ, boxing, Muay Thai, and MMA. Men can get used to training alongside and sparring with women pretty quickly, and people enjoy having women compete on the same card as men, representing their gyms in team competition as well as amateur and semi-pro competition. Martial arts competitions are heterogeneous—men and women are both a part of the sport spectacle. They are fans, athletes, trainers, and referees.

As Ryan Hall writes in his "Open Letter to the Martial Arts Community," "I am surrounded by people I respect not only as fighters and instructors, but as men and women, as human beings. I feel incredibly fortunate."


As authoritarian and hierarchical as gyms can be—and by all reports Lloyd Irvin's gym was and is a frightening example of that—they can also, as Hall writes, be something else. A gym can be a place of humility and respect, a socially level space in which people commit to supporting each other as they attempt to figure out their goals, and help each other to meet them. This assault represents a crisis within the martial arts community not because it seems to express a form of masculine aggression latent in the sport (which is how we tend to frame rape cases involving football players) but because it betrays the values that define it.

Sexual violence between members of the same community is engineered to either expel the victim from that community, or to make her sexual subjection a condition of her membership. Unlike the women assaulted by football players in the stories that make national headlines, the woman assaulted in this story was not only a fellow teammate; she was also a fellow employee.


There can be no assertion that rape culture is somehow endemic or specific to a sport that is desegregated: a sexual assault in that environment is like a sexual assault in any environment in which the victim knows, and has some kind of relationship to, her attacker. It isn't the sexism of the sport that's at issue, it's the sexism of that gym space, and the sexism of the world. These are, in fact, the conditions under which most sexual assaults happen. A person might be attacked by her co-worker, a member of the same military unit, a boss, a teacher. A member of her family. And this holds even in these football stories: these young women are not outsiders. They are, almost universally, fellow students, attending the same high school or university as their attackers.

Of course every community must work towards a world in which there is no sexual assault. Every instance makes us ask why and how. With regards the case at hand, we must consider how little justice there is for victims of sexual assault, and how much harder such cases can be for those assaulted by people they know. (Would that jury have acquitted those two men if they were strangers to the woman they attacked? In what world do you leave a consenting sexual partner on the ground outside in the winter when she is too drunk to even sit up?)


This case shows us that we need to consider how should we respond to such a profound transgression of the athlete's community.

We must work not only to make another attack less likely, but also to embrace the person attacked, to refuse to exile and shame her. To refuse complicity with narratives which make the presence of women within the sporting community into the problem, the "cause." We must make room for conversations about sex, violence, and power.


The football-centered conversations about rape just haven't been compelling to me. Too often, such conversations are anchored in a deeply patriarchal language that reinscribes the social vulnerability of women to masculine aggression. And while you will see the shadow of that mindset creep into the Gracie brother's discourse, overall, the conversation that they and Oden and Hall and others have been forwarding is actually centered on the integrity of fighting, as an art that defines a community.

At the heart of a fight is a consensual relation to violence. That consensus is not merely an agreement to fight: it is also an agreement to stop fighting when one fighter submits to the other and taps out.


Rape is a violation of the bonds of trust and dependence that make this sport even thinkable.

Bloody Elbow reported in February that Lloyd Irvin's best fighters left when one of the women on the team confided in a teammate that she'd been subjected to classic harassment that was moving towards sexual coercion. She needed help and advice.


In how many sports does a woman talk to a man, as a teammate, about this?

That one gesture—in which a junior woman athlete turns to a male colleague—and that one productive response—athletes united in their outrage—demonstrate how things can be. At least within the community of fighters invested in a not-sexist training space, the problem isn't men, and it isn't women. The problem is the sexist, authoritarian leader. That authoritarian figure is as much as a problem for men as for women.


There is no such thing as a "rape culture" unique to "jock culture"—it is only (only!) the deep, dramatic segregation of football as a purely masculine space that makes the Steubenville-like stories of social, public group attacks on women feel somehow unique to the sport. I wonder if one attraction to the phrase "rape culture" isn't the way it lets us disavow the fact that gender segregation builds sexual violence into a social structure. You won't find an authoritarian patriarchal space that doesn't in some way produce the conditions of possibility for this kind of attack, a kind of violence that partners well with homophobic attacks on genderqueer people.

Making this story all the harder to tell is the ferociousness of public ignorance about sex and power.


I imagine that people who join together in sexual assaults against people who are incapacitated (by alcohol, by drugs—sometimes by drugs given to them with malicious intent) are people who would not dare to consider their relationship to eroticism, to sex, and to pleasure.

I imagine that these are people who do not know how to participate in a conversation about sex and power. These are people who cannot solicit consent from a sexual partner—they are too afraid to ask even themselves what it is they are seeking in a sexual encounter that is as much with their male teammates as it is against the woman they are attacking. Even in the community of athletes trying to do the right thing, many stay away from the subject of rape, harassment, and sexism. Few know how to talk about it.


I end with this set of observations because Irvin's defense of the 1989 assault seems to amount to calling the woman a whore, describing the attack as a group "pulling a train" on a "freak" who then changed her mind. And that's how many people want to think of the New Year's Eve victim. Would these men even know what consensual group sex within a BDSM context even looks like? Of course not.

Within the sports media, there is almost no room for bringing a sexually progressive voice to bear on this topic.


People who play with those scripts (group encounters, D/s, bondage, etc.) tend to be quite practical about sex, working knowingly towards wisdom, often within pedagogical relationships with more experienced people. It is, in fact, entirely possible to seek out sexual communities that give you something like what a gym promises: A better understanding of one's body, one's desires and ambitions, a social intimacy not bound by romantic/domestic partnership.

Sexually progressive folks can be extraordinarily careful about consent and perfectly able to make that carefulness sexy. I wonder: Does the jury that acquitted those two guys have any idea what a consensual three-way looks like? Sex-phobic people may imagine it as people out of their wits going at it in a back alley blind drunk, because no one would dare do such a thing sober so if you are that drunk isn't that what you were looking for? If we can't trust a jury to do the right thing, it is perhaps because a jury of one's peers isn't likely to be able to think through the relationship between sex, power, and violence.


This is one of the horrifying things about heteromasculinist, sexist, homophobic, anti-sex spaces. They produce a fantasy of community and collective identity, but at the violent expense of specific bodies. They are driven by a terror of that which they are not, a fear of the bodies against which they define themselves. Sex becomes an instrument for producing specific bodies as socially abject.

In the totally segregated universe of football, the communal aftershock is not felt deeply enough. But in the BJJ community, at least within some quarters, this event has led to serious, serious soul searching and an affirmation of the sport's ethos, an interrogation of the power structures that distinguish one gym from the next, and an affirmation of shared vulnerability as not a weakness but a value. A thoughtful relationship to consent and violence is, in other words, built into the sport's heart. This may be one reason why so many women enjoy belonging to this particular sports community. Because on the mat, no really does means no.


Jennifer Doyle is the author of Hold It Against Me: Difficulty and Emotion in Contemporary Art and Sex Objects: Art and the Dialectics. She is a Professor of English and Co-Chair of LGBIT Studies at U.C. Riverside, and is the 2013-2014 Fulbright Distinguished Chair at the Center for Research on Transnational Art, Identity and Nation at the University of the Arts, London. In 2012, she was awarded an Andy Warhol Foundation Creative Capital Arts Writers Grant in support of her current writing about "the athletic turn." She is the author of the blog The Sport Spectacle.


Art by Jim Cooke