Which MLB Pundit Makes The Worst Predictions? Grading ESPN And Sports Illustrated
Republished with permission from PunditTracker.com, which just launched its fancy new site.
We have tracked the predictions of 14 MLB pundits from ESPN and Sports Illustrated—each of whom made preseason picks in the 2009, 2010, and 2011 seasons—across nine categories: six division winners, two pennants, and the World Series.
Here is how they ranked based on our $1 bet yield metric, which calibrates predictions for boldness by measuring the average payout (using Vegas odds) had you placed $1 bets on each of the pundit's selections. We have included the 2012 World Series prediction for each of the pundits.
$1 Bet Yield for MLB Pundits (2009-2011 Preseason Predictions)
| Pundit | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | Cumulative | 2012 WS Pick | |
| Jim Caple (ESPN) | $.056 | $4.43 | $0.15 | $1.71 | LA Angels | |
| Jayson Stark (ESPN) | $2.01 | $0.45 | $0.76 | $1.07 | Detroit | |
| Peter Pascarelli (ESPN) | $1.89 | $0.55 | $0.61 | $1.02 | Detroit | |
| Pedro Gomez (ESPN) | $1.35 | $1.34 | $0.15 | $0.95 | LA Angels | |
| Buster Olney (ESPN) | $2.01 | $0.45 | $0.27 | $.091 | Tampa Bay | |
| Joe Lemire (SI) | $1.62 | $0.45 | $0.42 | $0.83 | Texas | |
| Ted Keith (SI) | $1.22 | $0.82 | $0.42 | $0.82 | Yankees | |
| Favorites | $1.65 | $0.17 | $0.40 | $0.74 | Philadelphia | |
| Ben Reiter (SI) | $0.82 | $0.78 | $0.51 | $0.70 | Texas | |
| Albert Chen (SI) | $0.00 | $1.39 | $0.58 | $0.66 | Texas | |
| Eric Karabell (ESPN) | $1.51 | $0.17 | $0.15 | $0.61 | Philadelphia | |
| Tom Verducci (ESPN) | $1.04 | $0.45 | $0.15 | $0.55 | LA Angels | |
| Keith Law (ESPN) | $0.27 | $0.78 | $0.42 | $0.49 | Texas | |
| Orel Hershiser (ESPN) | $0.82 | $0.17 | $0.42 | $0.47 | Tampa Bay | |
| Jerry Crasnick (ESPN) | $0.82 | $0.17 | $0.15 | $0.38 | Texas | |
| Pundit Average | $1.14 | $0.89 | $0.37 | $0.80 |
The pundits' collective yield over the three-year period was $0.80, meaning that betting equally on all their picks would have resulted in a 20% loss. Only three of the fourteen pundits generated positive payouts. Jim Caple of ESPN topped the list, thanks almost entirely to his correct 2010 prediction that the San Francisco Giants would win the World Series (close to 20-to-1 odds). Caple's overall hit rate was in line with the pundit average (roughly 30%).
The group posted a solid 2009, with several correctly picking the Phillies to win the NL pennant. Aside from Caple, the performance in 2010 was mediocre, with only two other pundits yielding a positive payout. But that was nothing compared to the across-the-board abysmal numbers the following year. All of the pundits posted a sub-$1 yield in 2011.
Interestingly, despite the frequent discussion about payroll disparity in baseball, it has proven to be the toughest sport to predict over the past few years. Picking the favorites in MLB (as deemed by Vegas) generated only a $0.74 cumulative yield over the past three years, well shy of the $1.05 for NFL and $1.24 for NBA.
PunditTracker's mission is to bring accountability to the prediction industry by cataloging and scoring the predictions of pundits.
Image by Jim Cooke
Related
Three UFC Fighters Facing Uncertain Futures After Mexico
Best 2026 MLB Futures Bets for the NL West
Lu Dort’s Antics Outshine Big Win for Oklahoma City Thunder
Why Tiger Woods Playing the Masters Seems Unlikely
- UFC Mexico City Betting Predictions: Moreno vs Kavanagh Fight Night Picks
- Friday NBA Picks: Pistons vs Cavs, Nuggets vs Thunder, and More
- NL Central 2026 Futures Picks: Brewers, Pirates and Cardinals Bets
- Thursday Feb. 26th NBA Best Bets: Top Basketball Betting Predictions Today
- Three Best College Basketball Bets For Feb. 25th's Slate
- Three Best NBA Bets for Tuesday Feb 24th's Slate
- NL East Future Betting Picks: Season Win Totals and Division Predictions

