Who's Roiding? Let The People Decide
This image was lost some time after publication, but you can still view it [object Object] . After reading both Chuck Klosterman's excellent ESPN: The Magazine and John Heilemann's less-excellent but still compelling essay in , we are officially over-intellectualized when it comes to steroids. There are all kinds of points to be made on every side of the issue, and, frankly, we can't take it anymore. We will have no more high-minded debate of this topic. It is time for torches and storming the castle and burning in effigy ... it's time for good old fashioned mob rule.
Thank goodness, then, for Juiced Or Not? (link via Baseball Musings). The premise of the site: We shall know who is/was on steroids not by drug tests, or court transcripts, or anything else but simply: We think he/she did it. Therefore, he/she did. It's not scientific, it's not fair, but it sure is definitive, and at this point, we're so exhausted that that will work just fine with us.
So we encourage you all to head to the site to vote, and submit your own nominees. Because all this moral ambivalence is killing us: We just want to know whom to boo.
Juiced Or Not? (via Baseball Musings) The Breaking Point [ESPN] Let Juice Loose [New York Magazine]
Tiger Woods’ Legacy at a Crossroads After Latest DUI Arrest
Top NBA Bets Today: Expert Picks for March 29 Slate
Did the World Baseball Classic Hurt MLB Starting Pitchers?
NBA Picks for March 27: Best Bets for Friday Night Slate
- Arizona vs Purdue Elite 8 March Madness Betting Picks, Prediction
- NBA Picks for March 27: Best Bets for Friday Night Slate
- Why St. John's Can Cover Sweet 16 Spread Against Duke
- MLB Best Betting Picks for Friday March 27th Slate
- Three Sweet 16 Teams To Avoid Betting in March Madness This Weekend
- NBA Betting Picks: Best Bets for Thursday’s Slate
- Why the Nebraska Cornhuskers Have the Edge Against Iowa in Sweet 16

