CJ Stroud is a Heisman favorite, which can only mean he’s due for disappointment

Preseason Heisman favorites tend to fall short of expectations, which doesn’t bode well for the Ohio State QB

We may earn a commission from links on this page.
How warranted is the Heisman hype for CJ Stroud?
How warranted is the Heisman hype for CJ Stroud?
Image: Getty Images

The Heisman chase is officially underway, as sportsbooks have declared Ohio State quarterback CJ Stroud the early favorite. He’s not just a favorite though, he’s an abnormally huge favorite. According to OddsChecker US, Stroud is being given +200 odds (or a 33.3 percent chance) to win the Heisman. Those are the best odds for a preseason favorite since 2010.

That said, the people behind him aren’t too far behind. Alabama’s Bryce Young is being given +400 odds (or a 20 percent chance). USC’s Caleb Williams is listed at +600 (or a 14.3 percent chance). After the big three though, the favorites take a massive tumble. Clemson’s DJ Uiagalelei is fourth with +2500 odds, just a 3.8 percent chance to win. Then it’s Oklahoma’s Dillon Gabriel and Alabama’s Will Anderson at +3000, showing that sportsbooks don’t expect much competition for the award this season outside of the top three.

While I’m a big believer in CJ Stroud, the Heisman odds he’s being given make me feel a little uneasy. Historically, preseason Heisman favorites tend to fall way short of their season expectations. Since 2010, not a single preseason Heisman favorite has won the award. While Stroud’s +200 odds are the best of any preseason favorite by a wide margin, that doesn’t really mean anything. The award has always been notoriously difficult to predict. Stanford’s Andrew Luck was supposed to be a shoo-in for the award back in 2011. He didn’t win; Baylor’s Robert Griffin III did. USC’s Sam Darnold was supposed to be the 2017 Heisman winner by a wide margin. He didn’t get a single vote at the end of the season.


So, I guess the question is: “How warranted is this Heisman hype for Stroud?” Frankly, I don’t think it is. While there’s no denying Stroud’s talent, we already saw what Caleb Williams was capable of at Oklahoma last year. Despite transferring to USC, he retains his head coach Lincoln Riley, who also moved to USC, and will play in one of the easiest Power 5 conferences in America, the Pac-12. Sure, Williams didn’t have an insanely tough schedule last year, facing only five schools that ended the season with winning records, but Williams proved that he has the ability to shine against big-time opponents. In fact, arguably Williams’ best game, outside of his six-TD performance against Texas Tech, came against Oregon in the Alamo Bowl. Oregon is one of the top schools in the Pac-12, and Williams not only threw for 242 yards and three touchdowns, but he also led the Sooners to 47 points, tied for the seventh-most points in any bowl game that year. That’s impressive regardless of the opponent.

I’m not saying that Williams should be the favorite over Stroud, but rather that Stroud’s odds should be lowered. It tempers expectations, and from the perspective of sportsbooks everywhere, it also makes people all the more likely to bet on Stroud to win the award. Given that the preseason favorite hasn’t won the Heisman in over a decade, incentivizing bettors to put money on him would only make sense for sportsbooks to do, right?