Sports News Without Access, Favor, Or Discretion

The Ben Bishop Trade Is Startlingly Smart

David Zalubowski/AP Images

The first reactions to Sunday’s Ben Bishop trade were naturally along the lines of What the hell? Bishop, probably the best goalie in Tampa Bay Lightning history, is headed to a Kings team that only the day before got back its own franchise goalie, Jonathan Quick, after a four-month injury rehab. But there’s logic to this, on both sides—even if logic certainly doesn’t mean there’s not risk.

The trade sends Bishop and a fifth-round draft pick to L.A. in exchange for backup goalie Peter Budaj, defensive prospect Erik Cernak (a former second-round pick), a seventh rounder, and a conditional draft pick tied to the Kings’ results. It’s a haul that could amount to something, and even that chance is better than what the Lightning would have gotten for Bishop if they hadn’t moved him before the March 1 trade deadline. Bishop, 30, will be an unrestricted free agent, and with 22-year-old Andrei Vasilevskiy waiting for his chance to be the Lightning’s clear No. 1, Tampa wasn’t going to re-sign Bishop. With the Lightning seven points back of the second wild card spot, with four teams in the way, it makes sense to sell. And it makes sense to get something for Bishop rather than lose him for nothing this summer.


Bishop and Vasilevskiy have more or less split starts this season, and both have been a little disappointing. In 32 games, Bishop has a 2.55 GAA and a .911 save percentage, well off his career numbers, though he’s been much better over the last month.

Even so, Bishop’s stats are well behind Peter Budaj, who recorded career bests (2.12 GAA, .917 SV%) while starting in place of the injured Quick. But forget that. This trade definitely doesn’t make sense for L.A. if you believe the two goalies’ numbers this season are more relevant than their career track records. Rest assured that Kings GM Dean Lombardi doesn’t.

The Kings are making this trade because of Jonathan Quick, who has played all of four periods this year. Quick suffered a groin injury on open night, and while he looked great in his return to action on Saturday, groin injuries are tricky things, especially with athletic goalies like Quick.

“You’re never sure how well a guy who’s been out this long, is he going to have his ‘A’ game?,” Lombardi said. “This is not an insurance policy. [Bishop] needs to play.”


It remains to be seen how the Kings will divvy up the starts over the remaining 21 games, but Bishop is, bluntly, a better goalie than Budaj, and nothing bad can come of having a quality goalie right there, ready to step in to various degrees depending on how Quick plays. He’s insurance in case of injury, an elite backup if Quick is fine, a potential No. 1 in case Quick is ineffective, and, even if everyone plays well, he’s a way to extend the 31-year-old Quick’s useful life through this season and beyond.


“When you’ve been out this long that I think you’re going to ride this like on a ratio on the past of playing John 70 games, I think that’s totally impractical. No. 1, I don’t think it’s the best way to break in a guy who has been out this long, and you look at the condensed schedule of three in four nights, and No. 2 quite frankly, I don’t think it’s good at any time. I think the days of playing John Quick 70 games like we did two years ago make no sense in terms of not only letting him play at his best but also making sure that you have a player of his caliber extending his career and not wearing him out so he’s at the top of his game and he’s able to get the proper rest.”


The Kings are three points out of a playoff spot, so this is a pretty standard trade if you ignore the particulars—it’s a bubble team trading assets for a veteran half-season rental in the hopes of a postseason push. The difference, obviously, is that the rental is a goaltender and can’t play every night. But it’s a difference of degree, not of kind.

This is the Kings looking for gains in the margins. And while the most room for improvement was in scoring—L.A. is scoring 2.44 goals per game, 24th in the league—the market for scoring forwards is a seller’s market. (Just look how much the Wild had to give up for Martin Hanzal.) So if you can’t add offense, you can make it so the mediocre offense is more often enough to win games. “There’s not a lot of room here for error,” Lombardi said. “We want to take that out of the equation by making sure we have a No. 1 goalie in there every night.”


This feels like a fine trade for the Lightning, assuming there weren’t going to be any better offers. (A sizable assumption, of course.) Bishop was expendable to them, they believe Cernak will be an NHL player, and that conditional draft pick could end up as high as a second rounder. For the Kings? That remains to be seen, depending largely on Quick’s health. But they are a better team now than they were 24 hours ago, and they’re better prepared in case of disaster. That seems like particularly forward-thinking GMing, which, tellingly, might be why the trade felt so unexpected.

Deputy editor | Deadspin

Share This Story

Get our newsletter