Advertisement
Advertisement

Diaz got one out—a strikeout of pinch hitter J.T. Realmuto—sandwiched between two walks, a single, and two dingers, including a walk-off three-run Jean Segura job to left. The Mets had allowed just three hits, three walks, and one run through eight innings, and wound up losing in nine. It was enough to drive one comatose sports crank out of his mind:

What makes this hideous but not especially uncommon meltdown so painful for Mets fans is how unavoidable this kind of thing now seems. Incredibly, this was the fifth consecutive game where the Mets led by at least two runs and went on to lose. They led 3–1 in the eighth inning over the Cubs on June 23, and lost 5–3. They led 6–4 in the fifth inning over the Phillies on June 24, and lost 13–7. They led 5–2 in the sixth inning over the Phillies the following night, and lost 7–5. The following night they had a 4–0 lead in the sixth inning, and lost 5–4. And Thursday they led 3–1 in the ninth, and lost 6–3. Tim Britton of The Athletic has some ugly win probability numbers that throw this streak into proper perspective:

Advertisement

Before you say ah, every subpar bullpen goes through stretches where they can’t protect a lead, you should know that a team getting swept in a four-game series under these conditions is extremely rare, and is also pretty much the exclusive domain of your New York Mets:

Advertisement

There comes a point in every season when the Mets achieve maximum Mets. If we haven’t reached that point yet, I am genuinely fascinated and more than a little afraid to see what comes next.