Chris:

While reading about the Giants miraculous turn around Monday Night I noticed that they went back to a balanced Run/Pass gameplan (43/57), versus what they were doing in the prior 5 games (30/70). My question is do bad teams throw more because they are behind and feel like they need to score, or do they have bad play calling to begin with and that’s why they are behind in the first place? I obviously have zero experience coaching in the NFL but I feel like I could give you a 50/50 run/pass gameplan each week. Where do I apply??

Advertisement

It’s not that simple. The Patriots consistently pass more than they run, and it works from them. That tends to happen when Tom Brady is your QB. Same with the Packers before Aaron Rodgers got hurt. When you have Aaron Rodgers, it’s very, very stupid to NOT use Aaron Rodgers. Also, both the Packers and Patriots will often “run” the ball by deploying short passes, just like Bill Walsh used to do back in the day. You tailor your gameplan to do more of what you do well, and less of what you do horribly. This is why the Jaguars pass the ball five times a game.

So when a pud like Ben McAdoo turns over playcalling duties and the new guy succeeds with a more balanced game plan, that’s because the team was passing too much when it couldn’t pass for SHIT. And as for ditching the run in the middle of a game, that only makes sense if you’re better at passing. If you’re down 21 at the half and you have Zeke Elliott back there, you should definitely keep running. The personnel dictate the system, and any coach who disregards that should be designated to the sixth hour of Mike & Mike.

Advertisement

AJ:

Do you think anyone has ever actually used their hall pass (as in being free to sleep with a celebrity of their choosing)?

Advertisement

Oh sure, but there’s a catch. I guarantee you there has been some dude out there started off not famous, said to his wife, “What if you let me sleep with (insert supermodel or actress here)? LOL LIKE THAT WOULD EVER HAPPEN!” And then that dude gets famous himself and suddenly DOES have the chance to sleep with their dream lay. I bet that’s happened.

HOWEVER, I bet it’s pretty rare for a marriage to survive that kind of scenario. Once that dude gets a taste of the Hall Pass, he ain’t going back. So it would cause me a LOT of problems if Laetitia Casta turned out be a Deadspin reader. That would be a real sticky wicket. This is why I’m oddly grateful that, in real life, every Deadspin reader looks like Tom Ley. Absolutely no chance of temptation.

Advertisement

Matt:

More and more on this site and others, when an author/commenter is making whatever point they are making, their explanation begins with “I mean…” To me, “I mean…” is used when trying to explain something in a bit more detail that you have explained to some degree already, not as the opening to your explanation. EX: Q: Do you like hotdogs? A: I mean, they’re tasty!

Why would someone begin an answer with “I mean…” instead of just saying how tasty hot dogs are?

Advertisement

I use that a lot. It’s a verbal crutch that doesn’t add much of anything, like “The fact is” or “Frankly” or “Well.” Those are all placeholders people use while the little hamster wheel in their brain spins and they try to spit out something of substance.

But sometimes it works in print because it makes everything feel more conversational. Also, I have a vague idea of what I mean when I use “I mean.” Like, if I want you to know I’m having a bit of trouble articulating how fucked something is, it’s nice to telegraph that struggle. “I mean…you can’t just take your dick out on the basketball court! THAT’S JAILABLE SHIT!” Sometimes meaningless phrases have their own utility. Also, I can’t write EVERYTHING in all caps. Sometimes, you gotta throw down a “The truth of the matter is…” to pre-italicize your thoughts for you.

Advertisement

Phil:

The NFL needs to change its rule to make successfully onside kicks more achievable right? I’m not saying it should be 50-50, but successful onside kicks are inherently good and make games make exciting, so they should work more than 20% of the time at the end of the game.

Advertisement

No, because as much as I love me a good onside kick, shitty teams don’t deserve that. It’s not fair to the team up two scores to make the onside kick a 50/50 enterprise. I know it’s a real letdown when the moron kicker kicks the ball DIRECTLY to the hands team, but that’s what you get if you spent the first 59 minutes of a game playing like shit. FOOTBALL IS THE LAST TRUE MERITOCRACY, DAMMIT!

By the way, this Harvard study says that teams that run a surprise onside kick recover the ball 60 percent of the time. Motherfucking 60 percent!!!! How often does your favorite team spring the surprised onside kick? Once a year? Teams should be doing this twice a GAME. I’d do that, and then mix it up with pooch kick over the coverage once the other team gets wary of it. No one would ever see it coming! LET ME COACH THE BROWNS AND DO THIS. It can’t go any worse than how the Browns are doing now.

Advertisement

Bryan:

My wife last week started to cook chicken for dinner by placing it in a cold non stick pan on the stove and then turning on the heat. I looked at her and made a comment like she was crazy but she only answered, “What difference does it make if the pan gets hot anyway”. Am I crazy to think this is weird, or is this grounds for divorce?

Advertisement

Yeah no, she’s wrong. Don’t cook like that. There are certain recipes that call for starting with a cold pan, but they’re few and far in between. For normal cooking, get the pan hot first. Otherwise, nothing will sear. You won’t get any Maillard reaction. Gotta have that Maillard reaction. Start off meat in a cold pan and you’ll just end up with a soggy lump of gray meat instead, with some salmonella sauce on the side. Do not guzzle.

I’ve fucked up a couple times and thrown meat onto a pan I assumed was hot enough, only to be greeted with a terrible silence. Don’t let that happen to you. Live for the sizzle, America.

Advertisement

Charles:

I was reading the Funbag a while back and the letter about hobbies made me think about which hobbies are the coolest; as in, if someone told me their hobby, and my perception of that person instantly improves tenfold. For me, it’s falconer.

Advertisement

For me, it’s any hobby where I can get free shit from that person. For example, if your hobby is deep sea fishing, I’m gonna try to angle for a free excursion out on your craft, THE FLYING WASP. Very important to me that you have an expensive hobby that I’d like to pursue myself but am too much of a cheapskate to do so. Oh, did you say you have BBQ smoking trailer that can smoke 12 briskets at a time? And that you also enjoy collecting beachfront real estate? Why yes, I think we ought be friends. I find you fascinating and useful.

I am also still a preteen at heart who is DAZZLED by anyone who happens to be super athletic. Like, if someone at work turns out to be an expert mountaineer, I’m hugely impressed. I definitely wanna get drinks with that guy and absorb off some of his studliness by sheer osmosis. “This is my friend. He summited Everest! Isn’t it impressive that I know this person?”

Advertisement

Gary:

My partner and I agree that a horizontal staple when putting together documents is preferred, one of the many benefits being that when flipping through the packet, it doesn’t rip apart. However, some of our employees disagree, vehemently, and say the vertical staple is better for overall aesthetics. Being that we’re in charge, are my partner and I in the wrong, or are we right in making our employees cater to the sturdier staple job?

Advertisement

I’m #TeamHorizontal all the way. When the office copier collates and staples documents, it staples the horizontally. You gonna go against the copier? I think not. The only time you should do vertical staples is if you’re doing three staples down the left side of the stack in order to make a little book or calendar. My kids come back from school with a dozen of these things every week. “Oh cool, you made The Story Of A Raindrop!”

But for your standard work handout? A single horizontal staple in the corner is fine. Just don’t be the simpleton who staples the thing way too deep into the handout so that I can’t read anything in the corner. That’s a real idiot move.

Advertisement

Email of the week!

Paul:

Let’s say you’re a talented, but not all-time-great, rock drummer. You spend your entire 20s working your ass off, playing fun gigs, working side jobs, always practicing, but your career never really takes off and you never find yourself in a genuinely successful band. On your 30th birthday, staring out the Chipotle window onto a rainy parking lot, reflecting gloomily upon a lost decade of chasing your dream with jack shit to show for it, you get a phone call with an offer to go on a worldwide tour with a world-class musical act, visiting 4 continents over 6 months, earning, I don’t know, $150K+ in the process. It’s your big break! You can’t believe your ears! “Who’s the act?” you ask, dumbfounded and doing a really crappy job of staying cool even though you’re trying to. “Limp Bizkit!” replies the agent. Your stomach falls out - like everyone else, you DESPISE Limp Bizkit. It will kill you inside to play music that you hate with musicians that you hate at shows that you hate for fans that you hate. You will sit nightly behind a bass drum bearing the world’s worst band name and pretend to be having the time of your life. Every musician you know will mock you mercilessly for it, plus you’ll lose all of your regular gigs while you’re out of town for six months. It will not open up any doors for you career-wise because who gives a shit that you toured with Limp Bizkit? But you have a chance, after all these years, to finally make it big. Do you take the gig?

Advertisement

Fuck yeah, I do.