Is Erin Andrews' Reebok Endorsement Deal Journalistically Unethical?
Two weeks before Reebok signed ESPN's Erin Andrews to pitch the ZigTech line, she reported "Texas Christian players were slipping in their new Nike cleats during the Rose Bowl." Now, according to the New York Times ...
[E]xperts in journalism ethics and others are raising questions about whether her comments - given that the deal may have been in negotiation - constituted a conflict of interest, and whether any journalist should endorse a commercial product.
ESPN says that if Ms. Andrews ever covers stories involving shoes, it will be disclosed. No, seriously, look:
ESPN has said that Andrews rarely covers stories involving shoes, and that if she did, she would disclose her affiliation with Reebok.
Zola Budd beat, here she comes.
Andrews Faces Questions About a Deal With Reebok [ New York Times]
Erin Andrews: Sideline Princess, TV Dancing Star, Stalking Victim, Wishes To Be Taken More Seriously [ Deadspin]
Related
How the Pittsburgh Steelers Can Survive Without T.J. Watt
UFC Vegas 112 Picks: Best Bets for the Final ESPN-Era Card
Why a Joe Burrow Trade to the Vikings Actually Makes Sense
- Why the Blackhawks and Bruins Are Playoff Longshots Worth Betting
- Falcons vs Buccaneers Thursday Night Football Week 15 Betting Picks
- NBA Picks December 10th: Thunder vs. Suns and Spurs vs. Lakers Best Bets
- NHL Futures Picks: Best Value Bets for Teams to Miss the Playoffs
- Tuesday NBA Cup Best Bets: Picks for Heat vs. Magic and Knicks vs. Raptors
- NHL Picks for Tuesday: Best Bets for Lightning vs. Canadiens and Ducks vs. Penguins
- College Basketball 2025-26 National Title Contenders Best Future Bets

