Is Erin Andrews' Reebok Endorsement Deal Journalistically Unethical?
Two weeks before Reebok signed ESPN's Erin Andrews to pitch the ZigTech line, she reported "Texas Christian players were slipping in their new Nike cleats during the Rose Bowl." Now, according to the New York Times ...
[E]xperts in journalism ethics and others are raising questions about whether her comments - given that the deal may have been in negotiation - constituted a conflict of interest, and whether any journalist should endorse a commercial product.
ESPN says that if Ms. Andrews ever covers stories involving shoes, it will be disclosed. No, seriously, look:
ESPN has said that Andrews rarely covers stories involving shoes, and that if she did, she would disclose her affiliation with Reebok.
Zola Budd beat, here she comes.
Andrews Faces Questions About a Deal With Reebok [ New York Times]
Erin Andrews: Sideline Princess, TV Dancing Star, Stalking Victim, Wishes To Be Taken More Seriously [ Deadspin]
Related
Ranking the 10 Biggest Sports Moments From June 2026
World Cup Best Bets Today: Top Picks for France and Mexico
WWE Night of Champions: Biggest Takeaways From Saudi Arabia
Can MMA Fix Its Officiating Problem After UFC Baku?
- Wimbledon 2026 Predictions: Best Bets for the Men's Draw
- UFC Baku Picks: Three Bets to Target on Saturday's Main Card
- College Football Championship Odds: Four Value Bets for 2026
- Paul Skenes Headlines Friday June 26th's Best MLB Bets
- Three MLB Bets Worth Targeting on Thursday June 25 Slate
- MLB Picks Today: Backing the Yankees and Phillies-Nationals Over
- Tuesday MLB Best Bets: Two Pitching Props Worth Playing

