Is Erin Andrews' Reebok Endorsement Deal Journalistically Unethical?
Two weeks before Reebok signed ESPN's Erin Andrews to pitch the ZigTech line, she reported "Texas Christian players were slipping in their new Nike cleats during the Rose Bowl." Now, according to the New York Times ...
[E]xperts in journalism ethics and others are raising questions about whether her comments - given that the deal may have been in negotiation - constituted a conflict of interest, and whether any journalist should endorse a commercial product.
ESPN says that if Ms. Andrews ever covers stories involving shoes, it will be disclosed. No, seriously, look:
ESPN has said that Andrews rarely covers stories involving shoes, and that if she did, she would disclose her affiliation with Reebok.
Zola Budd beat, here she comes.
Andrews Faces Questions About a Deal With Reebok [ New York Times]
Erin Andrews: Sideline Princess, TV Dancing Star, Stalking Victim, Wishes To Be Taken More Seriously [ Deadspin]
Related
The Swamp Is Back, and Ole Miss Found Out the Hard Way
One UFC Prospect Just Became a Must-Watch After Vegas 121
Rams vs. Broncos Sunday Night Football Best Betting Pick
- UFC Vegas 121 Predictions: Best Bets for Saturday’s Fight Card
- UFC Vegas 121 Line Movement: Two Betting Favorites Have Completely Flipped
- Indiana vs. Northwestern Prediction: Best Bets To Start Week 4
- UFC Vegas 121 Betting Splits: Where the Sharp Money Is Landing This Weekend
- Diamondbacks vs. Padres Friday Best Betting Picks and Predictions
- MLB Best Bets Today: 3 Picks for Thursday September 24 Slate
- College Football Week 4 Picks: 3 Best Bets for Saturday

