Photo: Christian Petersen (AP Images)

Last Friday, ESPN published a big piece by Mark Schlabach that revealed the FBI had recorded phone conversations between Arizona head coach Sean Miller and sports agency runner Christian Dawkins in which they devised a pay-for-play scheme.

Schlabach reported that, specifically, the FBI wiretaps caught multiple calls between to two in which they agreed to pay DeAndre Ayton $100,000 to play for the Wildcats. The report said that during one call “Miller told Dawkins he should deal directly with him when it came to money.” The piece also laid out the ways in which Dawkins worked as a runner for ASM Sports Group, an agency headed by Andy Miller that has since had its records seized by the FBI. It also stated that the call between Miller and Dawkins was reportedly among the 3,000 hours worth of wiretapped calls the FBI is reviewing as part of its investigation into college sports.

Since the report came out, Miller’s been suspended from team activities, both practices and games, while the school looks into the matter; Ayton, meanwhile, has stayed with the team, and put up 28 points and 18 boards in a Saturday loss to unranked Oregon. The rest of the college sports realm has largely reacted the same way it has to every development of this case—some decried the backdoor payments as a direct act against God and bemoaned their black mark on a pure game; other, more reasonable people kept calling out the NCAA for being the corrupt institution that forces coaches and athletes to work out these deals with seedy characters in an unregulated black market. Miller, meanwhile, has receded from public life, while pundits discuss his actions as being “career-ending.”

After folks had some time to digest ESPN’s report over the weekend, though, some people started posing some questions. The questions started coming from where they usually do, fan boards and Reddit threads, and eventually began popping up on Twitter and in the mouth of an actual reporter.

The most valid question anyone’s raised so far concerns the specific date of the alleged call between Miller and Dawkins. On Feb. 24, Schlabach said in a TV talkback on ESPN that the specific call about the $100,000 payment was made in 2017.

ESPN then issued a correction on Feb. 25, clarifying that the phone call took place in the spring of 2016. The correction was updated at 8:15 p.m. the same night, at which point the reference to the call taking place in the spring was removed:

In a Feb. 24 SportsCenter talkback, ESPN used the wrong year in discussing the timeline in a story about telephone conversations between Arizona coach Sean Miller and Christian Dawkins, a key figure in the FBI’s investigation into college basketball corruption. Sources told ESPN the call in question was made in 2016.

Advertisement

This turned the timeline into an issue, as the detail of when the specific call was made was missing from the initial report. According to sources that spoke with 24/7, the U.S. Attorney’s office “notified multiple parties who had conversations with Dawkins that their phone calls had been recorded specifically during the dates of June 19, 2017 and Sept. 25, 2017.”

By that time, Ayton was already on the team at Arizona, as he committed to the Wildcats in September 2016 and signed in November; he began orientation on June 19, the day the wiretapping is supposed to have started, according to 24/7's sources. If this was the only period in which Miller’s and former Arizona assistant Emmanuel Richardson’s phone calls with Dawkins were recorded, it would mean that 1) Ayton had not yet been paid by the time he arrived on campus or 2) ESPN’s timeline is off by at least half a year.

Then, on Sunday evening, just 37 minutes after the ESPN correction went out, Schlabach tweeted the following news:

Advertisement

This tweet, along with him saying in his TV appearance that he was “told” about the call by his source, implies that he did not personally review the call or a transcript of the Miller call—note that the initial ESPN report contained no quotes from Miller’s part in the phone call, but stated only that the call took place and summarized what was said. The tweet also means he’s almost certainly relying on a source that is either a defendant or working on the defendant’s team, the notable part being his source is not the FBI. In the time since Schlabach’s tweet, there has been plenty of eyebrow-raising from the Very Online Fans, but also from at least one member of the national college sports media.

Yahoo’s Pat Forde cast some doubt not just on Schlabach’s timeline, but on the involvement of Sean Miller in the latest pay-for-play scandal, saying in a radio appearance on ESPN 680 on Tuesday, “I think there is a lot of dispute about the ESPN report, I will say that. There’s been a considerable amount of discussion of that disagreement over it.” He went on to add, “There was nothing in the documents we reviewed that implicated Sean Miller,” but stopped short of denying Miller’s involvement (“Was he involved or not, I don’t know”) before pointing out that Arizona assistant coach Book Richardson’s involvement alone, as the Louisville escort scandal proved, gives the NCAA plenty of reason to exile Miller. (When Forde was gently pressed by host Drew Deener on the motives behind the FBI sources in his Yahoo! report, he responded, “We’re comfortable with our sources.” The subject wasn’t broached again.)

The issue with the ESPN report isn’t whether an Arizona coach helped facilitate Ayton being paid the significant amount of money he deserves for his services—Book Richardson almost certainly did, though 24/7's sources doubt the price tag of $100,000, which is a shame because it means Ayton, one of the best players in the game, got short-changed. The issue is two-fold: First, Sean Miller’s involvement and current job status depend on a report that cites a source but no transcript or audio evidence. And second, the timeline of the phone call does indeed seem to be in a gray area, based on 24/7's reporting. ESPN has since doubled-down, telling 24/7 on Monday they stand by their timeline placing the call in the spring of 2016.

Advertisement

Of course, the call could have been made and tapped in the spring of 2016 and been included in FBI efforts outside of the date range that 24/7 reported, which means this would largely be folks blowing up over Schlabach going on TV and saying “2017” when he meant to say “2016.” Still, if you’re going to report on an NCAA violation because of the price tag and the big-name coach involved, it’s probably best to cover all your bases and not provide the gibbering loons who make up college fanbases even the smallest bit of ammunition.