Study: College Basketball Refs Suck, Too
A couple of professors watched a bunch of college basketball games and came to the very reasonable conclusion, in a peer-reviewed academic journal, that they were all being reffed by Dick Bavetta.
Or something like that. The study, authored by Kyle Anderson of Indiana University's business school and David Pierce of Ball State's sports administration program, turned up several examples of officiating bias:
* The probability of a foul being called on the visiting team was 7 percent higher than on the home team. * When the home team is leading, the probability of the next foul being called on them is about 6.3 percentage points higher than when the home team is trailing. * The larger the foul differential between two teams, the greater the likelihood that the next call will be made against the team with fewer fouls. For example, when a home team has three or more fouls than the visiting team, the probability that the next foul call is made against the visiting team is more than 60 percent. When the foul differential is as high as five, then that probability rises to 69 percent. The researchers also observed this trend when they looked at neutral-court games.
The authors go on to draw some weird conclusions — namely that referee bias offers an untoward incentive for "aggressive play," which is probably true but so what? And because this is the age of Gladwell, everything, even an otherwise compelling study about referee bias, has to be reduced to an insipid management-consulting parable. "In terms of a management setting," Anderson explains, "it might be the slacker who benefits from the situation involving a manager who might not want to appear biased." (What?)
But this is valuable work anyway, if only because it further corrodes the wishful notion that referees can operate on some sort of frictionless plane where the normal human weaknesses don't apply. Tim Donaghy was saying roughly the same thing, only with fewer footnotes.
Study looks at officiating in college basketball, finds patterns that reward aggressive play [IU News Room]
Related
WWE Night of Champions: Biggest Takeaways From Saudi Arabia
Can MMA Fix Its Officiating Problem After UFC Baku?
USMNT's World Cup Path Gets Tougher After Group Stage Draw
Dancing Mr. Met Perfectly Captured the Mets' 2026 Collapse
Wimbledon 2026 Predictions: Best Bets for the Men's Draw
- College Football Championship Odds: Four Value Bets for 2026
- Paul Skenes Headlines Friday June 26th's Best MLB Bets
- Three MLB Bets Worth Targeting on Thursday June 25 Slate
- MLB Picks Today: Backing the Yankees and Phillies-Nationals Over
- Tuesday MLB Best Bets: Two Pitching Props Worth Playing
- Prediction Markets Reveal Interesting NBA Draft Longshots
- UFC Vegas 119 Predictions: Best Bets for Kape vs. Horiguchi Fight Night

