MLB.com Eats Itself
This image was lost some time after publication. The inherent conflict of interest at MLB.com is consistently amusing. Those who work for MLB.com are:
1. Paid by MLB. 2. Go to offices in buildings owned by either MLB or individual teams. 3. Answer to bosses who answer to bosses who ultimately answer to Bud Selig.
Yet, MLB.com still maintains the illusion that the "journalists" who cover the teams are dispassionate and unbiased; real beat reporters, rather than, say, PR hacks. The main way they try to convince us: The tagline on every story, which reads, "This story was not subject to the approval of Major League Baseball or its clubs." This has always been a rubber-stamp template that's meaningless. Now we have proof.
MLB's site today runs a letter from commissioner Bud Selig addressed directly to fans. It's the usual prattle; we want to clean up the game, we care about you, please keep stuffing the dollars in the G-strings, don't you have anything larger than a five, so on. But sure enough, at the end of the story, there it is: "This story was not subject to the approval of Major League Baseball or its clubs."
This is a letter directly from the commissioner. Heavens, if he didn't approve it, who did? God? (David Stern?)
Selig Outlines Testing Goals [MLB.com]
June 12 MLB Picks: Two Best Bets for Friday
Four Big Takeaways From Day 1 of the 2026 World Cup
Texas Tech's Opponents Should Refuse to Play Brendan Sorsby
- Best Bets for Knicks vs. Spurs Game 4 at Madison Square Garden
- Best MLB Bets Today: Two Plays for Phillies-Blue Jays and Brewers-Athletics
- Three World Cup Futures Bets Worth Making Before Kickoff
- Tuesday MLB Best Bets: June 9th Pitcher Props Worth Targeting
- NBA Finals Game 2 Betting Picks and Predictions Spurs vs. Knicks
- MLB Picks Today: Two Sunday Bets Worth Backing
- MLB Predictions and Best Bets for Saturday's Biggest Games

