MLB.com Eats Itself
This image was lost some time after publication. The inherent conflict of interest at MLB.com is consistently amusing. Those who work for MLB.com are:
1. Paid by MLB. 2. Go to offices in buildings owned by either MLB or individual teams. 3. Answer to bosses who answer to bosses who ultimately answer to Bud Selig.
Yet, MLB.com still maintains the illusion that the "journalists" who cover the teams are dispassionate and unbiased; real beat reporters, rather than, say, PR hacks. The main way they try to convince us: The tagline on every story, which reads, "This story was not subject to the approval of Major League Baseball or its clubs." This has always been a rubber-stamp template that's meaningless. Now we have proof.
MLB's site today runs a letter from commissioner Bud Selig addressed directly to fans. It's the usual prattle; we want to clean up the game, we care about you, please keep stuffing the dollars in the G-strings, don't you have anything larger than a five, so on. But sure enough, at the end of the story, there it is: "This story was not subject to the approval of Major League Baseball or its clubs."
This is a letter directly from the commissioner. Heavens, if he didn't approve it, who did? God? (David Stern?)
Selig Outlines Testing Goals [MLB.com]
Bengals Have No More Excuses Entering the 2026 NFL Season
MLB Player Props Today: Best Bets for Wednesday, July 22
Why the WNBA Won't Monetize Sophie Cunningham's Viral Point
What Prediction Markets Are Telling Us About NFL 2026 MVP
- MLB Best Bets: Jacob Misiorowski, Dylan Cease Lead Monday's Top Picks
- Athletics vs. Diamondbacks Predictions: Best Bets, Odds and Props for Monday
- UFC Fight Night Best Betting Picks for Du Plessis vs. Usman in OKC
- France vs. England Best Bets: Three Picks for the World Cup Third-Place Match
- Dodgers vs. Yankees Friday July 17 Best Betting Picks and Props
- July 17 White Sox vs. Blue Jays Prediction, Odds and Best Bets
- Three MLB Futures Bets to Make After the All-Star Break

