New details have emerged regarding a class-action settlement involving sweepstakes casino operator Pulsz and its companion platform, Pulsz Bingo. The agreement gives eligible players in six states a choice between receiving in-platform Gold Coins or electing a cash payment based on their historical spending.
According to settlement information, the case stems from claims that purchases of virtual currency on the platforms amounted to illegal gambling under certain state laws. The lawsuit did not result in a court finding that the games violated any law, and the operator has denied wrongdoing throughout the case.
The settlement applies to eligible users in Alabama, Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, New Jersey and Massachusetts. Players who qualify under the agreement are automatically slated to receive Gold Coins unless they actively choose the cash-payment option.
Those who want cash instead of virtual currency must submit an election form before the Nov. 30 deadline. A final approval hearing is currently scheduled for Dec. 31, when a court will review the proposed resolution before determining whether it should take effect.
Under the terms currently outlined, eligible players who choose the cash option would receive an amount equal to 23% of their net spending on Pulsz or Pulsz Bingo. Net spending generally reflects deposits or purchases minus any redeemed prizes or winnings.
For some claimants, the cash option may provide a more direct form of compensation. Others may prefer remaining within the platform ecosystem and accepting the Gold Coin allocation that would be issued automatically if no election is made.
Settlement administrators have indicated that proof of identity may be required for certain claim submissions. Players seeking cash payments are encouraged to review the settlement notice carefully to understand eligibility requirements and any documentation that may be necessary.
The final amount distributed to class members could also be affected by factors such as fees, costs and court approval. As with many class-action settlements, exact payment figures may not be finalized until after the approval process concludes.
The case reflects a larger trend facing the sweepstakes casino industry. Operators in multiple states have faced lawsuits and regulatory scrutiny over whether their dual-currency gaming models should be treated differently from traditional online gambling products.
In recent years, plaintiffs have increasingly argued that purchases of virtual coins in certain sweepstakes-style platforms qualify as gambling transactions under state law. Operators, meanwhile, have generally maintained that their products comply with applicable laws and offer free methods of participation.
The Pulsz settlement does not establish legal precedent regarding those questions. Instead, it represents a negotiated agreement intended to resolve the dispute without further litigation. The company continues to deny the allegations raised in the lawsuit.
With claims now open and election deadlines approaching, affected players in the six covered states must decide whether to accept Gold Coins by default or submit a request for a cash recovery based on their qualifying net spending. The outcome of the December approval hearing will determine whether the settlement moves forward under its current terms.
Loading …
