Social casino operator Playstudios has agreed to a $3 million class action settlement that resolves allegations its virtual-chip sales violated gambling laws in six states. The agreement affects players in Alabama, Ohio, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Tennessee and Kentucky who spent money on virtual chips in several Playstudios-operated casino-style games.
The settlement stems from litigation filed in Alabama that challenged the legality of virtual currency sold within the company’s social casino portfolio. While Playstudios has denied wrongdoing, the company agreed to settle the lawsuit and avoid the costs and uncertainties associated with continued legal proceedings.
According to court filings, plaintiffs argued that the sale of virtual chips in games such as myVEGAS, Pop! Slots, myKONAMI Slots, MGM Slots Live, myVEGAS Blackjack and myVEGAS Bingo amounted to illegal gambling under applicable state laws.
The complaint alleged that consumers paid real money to participate in casino-style gaming activities, even though the virtual chips themselves could not be redeemed for cash prizes. Similar arguments have appeared in a growing number of lawsuits targeting social casino operators over the past several years.
Playstudios rejected the allegations and maintained that its products comply with applicable laws. The settlement does not include any admission of liability and instead serves as a negotiated resolution between both sides.
The settlement provides two potential forms of compensation for eligible class members. Players who do not submit an election form will automatically receive a virtual-currency award worth approximately 27% of their total spending on qualifying games.
Those who prefer a cash payment must affirmatively select that option. Eligible players can seek a payment valued at up to 23% of their spending, although the final amount could be reduced if the number of cash claims exceeds the portion of the settlement fund allocated for those payments.
Class periods differ depending on the state involved. Most covered claims extend through June 30, 2026, while Kentucky’s class period ends earlier in June 2023. Players who qualify for compensation have until Oct. 21, 2026, to make their election.
The Playstudios case is the latest example of legal scrutiny facing online casino-style gaming products that operate outside traditional regulated gambling frameworks. In recent years, both social casino companies and sweepstakes casino operators have faced lawsuits alleging their products function as unlicensed gambling.
Although social casinos and sweepstakes casinos generally use different business models, plaintiffs have increasingly relied on similar legal theories when challenging both industries. Those arguments often focus on whether virtual currencies provide sufficient value to transform gameplay into a gambling activity under state law.
The outcome of these cases varies widely by jurisdiction, but settlements have become a recurring feature of the legal landscape as operators evaluate litigation risks and defense costs.
Eligible users of the affected Playstudios games should review the settlement details carefully before the October deadline. Players who do nothing will receive the default virtual-currency award, while those seeking cash compensation must submit the required election form.
Although the $3 million settlement represents a relatively small figure compared to the broader social casino market, it adds another chapter to an evolving legal debate over virtual currencies, casino-style gaming and how gambling laws apply to digital entertainment products.
Loading …
