What ESPN Mobile SHOULD Have Been
This image was lost some time after publication, but you can still view it [object Object] . In response to our post yesterday about ESPN taking a $25 million loss on ESPN Mobile, reader Jim from Boston writes in to tell us where, precisely, the network's pricing plan might have gone wrong.
A little bit of market research would have solved this for them. Q: What market segment needs the absolute, most up to date sports scores, info, etc? A: Bookies. Q: What phone does your average bookie have? A: The cheapest-ass no-contract pre-paid he can find since he'll only have it for a couple weeks before he gets another. Add in some voice encryption, host the billing records in a third world country, and you might have a real product. Not that I know anyone who would need that specific set of features. Ahem.
So depressingly, obviously true.
What's $25 Million Between Friends? [Deadspin]
Related
Three Takeaways From Wyndham Clark’s U.S. Open Victory
WWE Mid-Year Grades for Rising Superstars in 2026
Father’s Day in Sports: Three Dads Making a Huge Impact
Manel Kape Calls for Title Shot – Will He Get It?
Brendan Sorsby Could Be Worth the Gamble for These NFL Teams
Three NHL Teams Ready to Make Major Offseason Moves
- Best Super Bowl Bets to Make Before NFL Training Camps Begin
- Wednesday MLB Best Bets: Two Pitcher Props for June 17th
- MLB Best Bets Today: Two First Five Innings Plays For Tuesday’s Card
- MLB Best Bets: Rockies, Dodgers and Chase Burns Highlight Monday Picks
- 2027 NBA Championship Odds, Picks, and Sleepers
- Rockies vs. Athletics Sunday June 14 Betting Pick
- UFC Freedom 250 Best Bets: White House Fight Night Picks

