Mike Leach: "ESPN Isn’t Going To Let Little Inconvenient Details Like Facts Get In The Way Of Their Agenda"

Every morning, the fine folks at Sports Radio Interviews sift through the a.m. drive-time chatter to bring you the best interviews with coaches, players, and personalities across the sports landscape. Today: Leach is the only one not under a gag order.

Mike Leach joined WQAM in Miami with the Big Dog, Joe Rose to talk about how he feels about ESPN suspending Bruce Feldman, whether or not he think Craig James has become the golden boy at ESPN, what he thinks of Texas Tech siding with Craig James as opposed to him when it came to Adam James, and if he thinks Craig James was doing things behind his back when he was the head coach at Texas Tech.

How he feels about ESPN suspending Bruce Feldman: "I think ESPN just isn't going to let little inconvenient details like the facts get in the way of their agenda. The bottom line is we don't have anything in the book that isn't 100 percent factual and we don't have anything in that book that's not totally backed up by documents. Furthermore Bruce had permission ahead of time to do this book from ESPN. The guy that got the car in the ditch for them was Craig James. That's where they ought to be looking. Not Bruce Feldman."

Whether or not Craig James has become the golden boy at ESPN: "He evidently is because if you look at the public reaction, if you look at the blogs, everybody sees through it and understands it. People are recognizing the truth and nobody appreciates Craig James' role in this. It's insulting to everyone's intelligence. Between Craig James and ESPN both they're starting with this. Me being too dumb to see through what they're doing and then it became well the public is too dumb to see through what they're doing. Then with this thing with Bruce they think it's almost like they're so smart that we won't understand it anyway and they're so powerful that we have to do whatever they want no matter what. Everyone is seeing through it and everybody resents it."

On the university taking Craig James' side when it came to Adam James: "I was gonna cut Adam after the bowl game and I think they knew that. After the bowl game it's a nice transition, he gets some nice experience, and then the next semester starts and then he is somewhere else or certainly not on the team. I think it woulda worked out well for everybody other than the fact that they tried to get me fired, which ultimately they did. In the case of our chancellor, the biggest thing is they had a certain amount of acrimony over the previous contract negotiations and didn't want to pay the money. The biggest thing was the administration, and really only one member of the administration, and two regents that he had in his pocket because in ten years, the administration at Texas Tech I thought was pretty good. I think they lost face on the contract negotiations and decided that they were going to hide behind sovereign immunity to not pay me."

Whether or not he thinks Craig James was doing things behind his back when he was the head coach at Texas Tech: "There's no question he was doing things behind my back. He was one of those guys that was ridiculously high maintenance and I had to deal with on a daily basis almost. So did some of my other coaches. Ultimately he started calling the Chairman of the Board of Regents and things when I wouldn't indulge his deals as far as playing his kid. He definitely did things behind the scenes no question to deteriorate the efforts of our staff."

This post, written by Jimmy Shapiro, appears courtesy of Sports Radio Interviews. For the complete highlights of the interview, as well as audio, click here.

More from Sports Radio Interviews • Clinton Portis would still be in DC if not for Jim Zorn. • Jamie Moyer is seriously still planning a comeback. • Josh Childress says don't play in Europe; play in China!