NCAA Issues Statement Over Indiana Anti-Gay Law, NFL Says Nothing [Update]
Yesterday, in a private ceremony in his office, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence signed into law the state's "religious freedom" bill, which would allow businesses to refuse service to LGBT customers. Numerous local companies and institutions have wasted no time in condemning the law, and that includes the NCAA.
NCAA President Mark Emmert released this statement:
"The NCAA national office and our members are deeply committed to providing an inclusive environment for all our events. We are especially concerned about how this legislation could affect our student-athletes and employees. We will work diligently to assure student-athletes competing in, and visitors attending, next week's Men's Final Four in Indianapolis are not impacted negatively by this bill. Moving forward, we intend to closely examine the implications of this bill and how it might affect future events as well as our workforce."
The NCAA's offices are in Indianapolis, which will host next week's Final Four and next year's Women's Final Four, so this is something that could legitimately affect its operations. But more than that, the NCAA has a history of backing progressive causes. Last year it spoke out publicly against a proposed state amendment banning gay marriage; in 2005 it unilaterally issued playoff bans to certain teams unless they dropped their American-Indian mascots; in 2001 it banned Mississippi and South Carolina from hosting ( most) postseason events because those states' capitols still fly the Confederate flag.
The NFL is strongly tied to Indiana as well. Aside from just having a franchise that does business there, the combine takes place at Lucas Oil Stadium every year. But the NFL, which spoke out last year against a similar "religious freedom" bill in Arizona, and even considered moving the Super Bowl, has been completely and mysteriously silent, even in response to requests for comment from multiple outlets (including this one).
Maybe it's coming today—maybe the statement is being crafted as we speak. But for a league that considers itself a moral arbiter on everything, that's now facing some real-world discrimination, and that has the rare audience that spans all ideological spectrums, it'd be nice to hear something soon.
Update, 2:00 p.m.: "We do not have a comment at this time," NFL spokesman Greg Aiello told the Indianapolis Star. "We are in the process of studying the law and its implications."
Guardians vs. White Sox ALDS Preview, Odds and Prediction
UFC 332 Has a New Champion to Crown, Here’s What to Watch
Two UFC 332 Fights Are Seeing Major Line Movement
UFC 332 Underdog Pick: King Green vs. Esteban Ribovics
10 NFL Players Who Could Be Traded Before the Deadline
MLB Playoff Futures: 3 Bets to Make Before the ALDS and NLDS
- MLB Playoff Futures: 3 Bets to Make Before the ALDS and NLDS
- UFC 332 Betting Splits: Where the Sharp Money Is Landing This Weekend
- Steelers vs. Browns Prediction: Best Bet for Thursday Night Football
- Phillies vs. Braves Game 3 Prediction: Best Bets for NL Wild Card
- 3 NFL Futures Bets to Make After a Wild Start to the Season
- Red Sox vs. Yankees Game 2 Prediction: Best Bets for AL Wild Card
- Red Sox vs. Yankees Game 1 Prediction: Best Bets for AL Wild Card

