Report: USC Football Gets 2-Year Bowl Ban
It only took six years, but USC is finally getting called to the NCAA principal's office. Postseason ban, loss of scholarships, games and possibly that 2004 national title. You know, now sounds like an excellent time to join the Pac-10.
I was hoping to avoid talking about the conference thing again until something official was announced, but it now seems rather pertinent (and unavoidable.) Unless Notre Dame throws a Hail Mary, it looks like Nebraska will be invited to join the Big Ten on Friday. That means Texas will want out of the Big 12 and the Pac-10 will be waiting with open arms. (Allegedly, they've already started by poaching Colorado.) So in addition to being smacked with the only real penalty the NCAA ever dishes out, Lane Kiffin is about to find out that by the time his team becomes bowl eligible again, Texas and Oklahoma will have already taken over the lease at the Rose Bowl. So much for their cute little dynasty.
(Oh, and the newest rumor is that a new Pac-16 will want TWO BCS bids instead of a conference championship game. Which is total bulslhit, right? Let's just write them a check for a billion dollars and we won't even have to play the games anymore.)
Formal announcements from the NCAA and USC (including a possible appeal) will come later this week. Meanwhile, Reggie Bush sleeps the sleep of the just.
Source: Two-year postseason ban for USC football [ESPN Los Angeles]
- College Football Picks Today: Three Best Bets for Saturday's Massive Slate
- UFC Fight Night Underdog Pick: Davey Grant Offers Value at +270
- College Basketball Picks: Two Saturday Sleeper Bets on Nov. 7th
- UFC Vegas 124 Betting Splits: Where the Sharp Money Is Landing This Weekend
- NBA Best Bets Today: Spurs, 76ers and Lakers Highlight Friday's Picks
- NBA Best Bet Picks November 5: Magic, Warriors Predictions
- Stars vs. Blue Jackets Prediction: Why Dallas Has the Edge on Thursday











