David Brooks: My Judgment Is Appallingly Bad, Therefore Listen To Me
Photo credit: [object Object] In the abstract, David Brooks’s choice to begin today’s about the assorted Trump/Russia investigations with the following isn’t necessarily a bad one.
I was the op-ed editor at The Wall Street Journal at the peak of the Whitewater scandal. We ran a series of investigative pieces “raising serious questions” (as we say in the scandal business) about the nefarious things the Clintons were thought to have done back in Arkansas.
Now I confess I couldn’t follow all the actual allegations made in those essays. They were six jungles deep in the weeds. But I do remember the intense atmosphere that the scandal created. A series of bombshell revelations came out in the media, which seemed monumental at the time. A special prosecutor was appointed and indictments were expected. Speculation became the national sport.
In retrospect Whitewater seems overblown.
The choice I object to is the choice not to begin the next sentence with, “For this reason, I resign my post, effective immediately, and resolve myself to a life of solitude in the desert.”
Hey Dave! Eat shit!
[ NYT]
What Prediction Markets Are Telling Us About NFL 2026 MVP
The Sacramento Kings Need to Blow It Up Before It's Too Late
Ben Askren Didn't Win the Match—But He Won the Weekend
- UFC Fight Night Best Betting Picks for Du Plessis vs. Usman in OKC
- France vs. England Best Bets: Three Picks for the World Cup Third-Place Match
- Dodgers vs. Yankees Friday July 17 Best Betting Picks and Props
- July 17 White Sox vs. Blue Jays Prediction, Odds and Best Bets
- Three MLB Futures Bets to Make After the All-Star Break
- Three Heisman Trophy Sleepers Worth Betting Before the 2026 Season
- England vs. Argentina Best Bets: Three Picks for the World Cup Semifinal

