How The NFL Lied Its Way Out Of Millions In Workers' Comp
Yesterday California's governor signed into law a bill that blocks athletes from filing future workers' compensation claims for games they play in the state, unless they played for a California team. It was shut down thanks to intense lobbying from the NFL and other pro sports leagues that hinged on the argument that the claims were costing taxpayers money. That's a blatant lie.
The California Labor Code was certainly controversial. Many athletes, the bulk of them comprising thousands of former NFL players, have already filed claims against their employers for injuries suffered on the job. California allowed them to cite "cumulative injuries," the sort of minor head trauma that builds to long-term permanent disability. There's no need to point to a specific injury that caused the damage, which is helpful when there's not one single blow that does it.
(It's interesting to note that some of these players filed injury claims even while publicly dismissing the plaintiffs in the NFL concussion lawsuits.)
The pending claims from former NFL players could be worth up to $1 billion. So when the state legislature was considering a bill to amend the code to limit it to athletes who played for California teams, the sports leagues sent lobbyists to get across the message that former players were only bilking the state and taxpayers out of money. The Los Angeles Times' Michael Hiltzik explained why this is bullshit:
The leagues' bid for sympathy depends on most laypersons having no idea about how workers' compensation works. So here's a primer. To begin with, taxpayers don't pay for workers' comp; employers do, either by buying commercial workers' comp insurance or (if they're big enough) self-insuring. Their premiums are overwhelmingly based on their type of business and their claims record. The premium paid by the employer of file clerks will be very different from that of a skyscraper builder.Therefore, if California workers'-comp judges take a more liberal view of long-term brain injuries for football players (and as yet there's no evidence that they do), that may drive up premiums paid by sports teams, but it won't affect the premium paid by grocery stores.The leagues "are trying to make it look like these are costs that will fall on all employers," Neuhauser says. "But it has nothing to do with current rates. Sports teams' premiums will go up, but not those for construction companies or anyone else."
Since California was one of a small number of states that allow claims for "cumulative injuries"—and the only one to allow players from out-of-state—most football players suffering permanent effects from a career's worth of repeated brain traumas now have no legal recourse to seek compensation. (And that compensation is legally capped at $270 a week for up to 320 weeks.)
California gives a huge payoff to the NFL [L.A. Times]
WWE Night of Champions: Biggest Takeaways From Saudi Arabia
Can MMA Fix Its Officiating Problem After UFC Baku?
USMNT's World Cup Path Gets Tougher After Group Stage Draw
Dancing Mr. Met Perfectly Captured the Mets' 2026 Collapse
Wimbledon 2026 Predictions: Best Bets for the Men's Draw
- College Football Championship Odds: Four Value Bets for 2026
- Paul Skenes Headlines Friday June 26th's Best MLB Bets
- Three MLB Bets Worth Targeting on Thursday June 25 Slate
- MLB Picks Today: Backing the Yankees and Phillies-Nationals Over
- Tuesday MLB Best Bets: Two Pitching Props Worth Playing
- Prediction Markets Reveal Interesting NBA Draft Longshots
- UFC Vegas 119 Predictions: Best Bets for Kape vs. Horiguchi Fight Night

