MLBPA: MLB's extreme offers creating unity among players

With MLB's collective bargaining agreement with the MLB Players Association expiring at the end of the 2026 season, the two sides continue to openly debate the specifics of what they're looking for in the next deal.

As far as the MLBPA is concerned, the extreme nature of the first few things the league has said it would like to change -- including the introduction of a salary cap and drastic transformations to draft eligibility and free agent contracts -- has served an unexpected purpose among the players.

"I have never seen this degree of unity at this point among agents and players," MLBPA interim executive director Bruce Meyer told Front Office Sports. "I think, honestly, the league has done us a favor because their proposals are, in fact, so obviously and extremely bad for players at all levels that it's actually been a benefit for our unity.

"Anybody who's banking on Major League Baseball players cracking: it's never happened. It's not going to happen. And that's why we're the only (major U.S. pro league) who don't have a salary cap."

The latest suggestion presented Thursday was the team owners' desire to implement a policy limiting free agents who change teams to deals no longer than five years and $202 million, while players staying with their team wouldn't be permitted to sign contracts longer than six years and $265 million.

That's a drastic change considering there are currently 20 major league players on deals larger than that threshold.

The owners also have made it clear they want to institute a salary floor of $171.2 million and a salary cap of $245.3 million. That would level the playing field financially, as three major league teams currently have team payrolls above $300 million and five have payrolls of less than $89 million.

While this may provide a more sizable revenue portion for the players, the MLBPA has argued players would earn less under the proposal and reiterated its strong opposition to a salary cap.

The owners also have suggested a serious shift to MLB draft eligibility, making high school players undraftable and reducing the draft from 20 rounds to 12.

"One of the common themes in all their proposals is removing player choice, removing player flexibility and removing player empowerment," Meyer said. "Whether that's (U.S.) amateur, international or major league, that's been the common theme."

As for the risk of losing games next season due to an impasse in negotiations, the current labor agreement between the owners and the union does not expire until Dec. 1, so the sides still have time to work out a deal. Both sides are offering their takes on the future of the game without engaging in negotiated bartering.

--Field Level Media