The Final Four Sleeps With The Fishes
This image was lost some time after publication. Fascinating story in The New York Times this morning; an economist postulates that, in college basketball, point shaving takes place in about 5 percent of all games with big spreads. The economist, Justin Wolfers from the University of Pennsylvania, has collected results from nearly 16 years of college basketball games and claims "in a surprisingly large number of them, it turns out that heavy favorites just miss covering the spread."
There is a strange dearth of games in which 12-point favorites win by, say, 13 or 16 points. And there are a lot of games that they win by 11 points or slightly less. There is just no good explanation for this.
We know this story, just on the tip of the NCAA tournament, is a bit of a poo in the punch bowl. But when you go to the bar next Thursday, and that guy next to you is saying things like, "Watch this, they're gonna end up just under the 13," well, try not to think too much about it.
Sad Suspicions About Scores In Basketball [NY Times]
(By the way, that picture, of course, is of the late Carmine Lupertazzi, who, according to "The Sopranos," invented point shaving.)
Related
- Spurs vs Thunder Game 2 Best Bets: Top Picks for Western Conference Finals
- MLB Picks Today: Best Bets for Red Sox vs Royals and Orioles vs Rays
- Spurs vs. Thunder Game 1 Best Betting Picks and Predictions
- Canadiens vs. Sabres Game 6 Betting Picks and Predictions
- UFC Vegas 117 Betting Picks: Best Props and Predictions for Saturday Night
- MLB Picks Today: Twins and Mariners Headline Friday's Bets
- NBA Playoff Best Bets: Cavaliers vs Pistons and Spurs vs Timberwolves Picks

